| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,487 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11899 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
Can't see much wrong, Ms-65 or so.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
64 given the left obverse field.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
AU58, dont like the fingerprints on the reverse. may have had a dip but market acceptable. not a fan of the blotchy color
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
MS63 -- old dip, retoned. I can't go much above 63 with the muted luster on the obverse -- this is a readily-available date in grades up to 66 and to be 65 for me for an 1896 it should have booming cartwheel luster unless heavily toned. I get the feeling there is something wrong with the obverse picture. It feels "off" in both color and sharpness...pics in hand would be good.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11899 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11899 Posts |
I thought this one was undergraded  |
|
Valued Member
240 Posts |
It looks 65 to me. There is a scuff above the nostril that I noticed, but no way this is a 63.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
Could the Rim have held it down a couple points?
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,487 |
|
Posted 03/24/2018 8:41 pm
