| Author |
 Replies: 40 / Views: 20,624 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74994 Posts |
It would be interesting if we can prove that this is a worn Master Die issue, but we don't know for sure. It would definitely make a very interesting thread discussion.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
252 Posts |
Group,
Thanks for all your positive comments on my coin. In your professional opinion, what would you grade this as? I'm new to this coining world and just don't understand the acronyms you use to describe coins. Especially, when it comes to accurate descriptions. I'm going to continue to learn though.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
Hello,
I know that this post is old but I am wondering if there was ever anymore information learned about this quarter. I have one that's very similar on the Obverse. Would like to know if you ever found out anything further
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Basically they all look like that, that year. So there would be no premium for them.  If the master hub was swollen, they would all be like that. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
I will answer to this question about the Observe hubs of quarters.
in the follows years new hub was introduce:1965, 1974, 1977, 1983, 1987, 1988, 1992, 1994.
Also is 1976 for the bicentenary and after in 1999 a new one for the State program.
Caracteristic for 1982-1983 the diameter of the design was reduced in order to elongate the design from the rim.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The design was the same when they created the new master hub. So nothing was reduced. It was the "swollen master hub" that enlarged the design that made the differences on the 1982-1983 quarters.  |
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
It's possible that it's just wear I'm seeing but it appears that the first 3 letters overlap the rim and the rest sit below but right against it. Thanks for the information!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Sorry COOP but if I remember well also David Bowers and Fred Weinberg mention what I state. I give the years when the Hubs was redesign. If you superpose and 1982 design and the 1983 design you will be able to see the differences.
PS. A very know investor and collector from New Jersey permitted me to analyze three bags of quarters from 1982 and three from 1983.
I find that in 1982 we can find 2.75 coins of 100 with the new design of the 1983.
Edited by silviosi
07/14/2022 11:18 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Well that didn't happen. They are all the same that year. If that were the case, there would be large and small dates that year. And that didn't happen. They are all the same that year. http://varietyvista.com/09b%20WQ%20...arieties.htmNote the variety listings for the obverse. There is a change on the 1983, but no 1982 coins were affected. Edited by coop
07/14/2022 11:24 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 40 / Views: 20,624 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 05/16/2018 09:31 am
