| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,492 |
|
|
New Member
39 Posts |
Edited by coin2020
12/10/2018 7:14 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can see no evidence of another date below 1998, not even a hint.  to the CCF! |
|
New Member
 39 Posts |
Trying to get a better pic
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34413 Posts |
@coin2020, with the current pics, I agree with the frog. Are you sure that it isn't Pareidolia? "If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
I guess you're right - it does look like 1984. But has got to be just stains or toning. It would be impossible to have another date minted under the real date..
|
|
New Member
39 Posts |
Could be paridolia, but it wasn't for this one!   |
|
New Member
39 Posts |
You can see the 1 perfectly
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
This is what I see - check out the last photo that is circled in blue. But like Spence stated - Pareidolia Edited by Mark1959
12/10/2018 8:49 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Sorry. As someone once said, this is like seeing the Virgin Mary on a piece of burnt toast.  Edited by Coinfrog
12/10/2018 9:00 pm
|
|
New Member
39 Posts |
Thanks guys I'm sending it in I'll post an update when I get it back
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
Good luck!  |
|
New Member
39 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
1. Devices should rise from the fields. Not be level with the fields. Stains are level with the fields.
2. If the dates were doubled, all the other devices would be doubled, on both sides of the coin.
3. If you submit it, then it will come back as a normal coin with a grade. If they consider the coin cleaned, then it will not be grade, but given a genuine coin notation.
|
|
New Member
39 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,492 |
|
Posted 12/10/2018 7:18 pm
