Quote: At the top of the page, mrbadexample, next from the end of the "Format" line of icons, it's the one with the rightward-extending red arrow.
Gotcha.
I do have a passing interest in the 1811-1830 tokens too. I saw the Rugeley 2d you posted on another thread. Very nice - Rugeley is about 15 miles from me. :)
And yes, it's Pridmore 62 that I have scarcely seen, in contrast to 61 which seems to be relatively common. It seems that 62 was the final die used, and only for a short period of time, before its owner (whoever that may be) may have emigrated from IOM to PEI along with the reverse die, as Pridmore suggests.
blargish, my quick diagnostic (and the one you pointed out months ago, I think) is where the foot of the K falls in relation to the N. Easier to notice in comparison with the variety I originally posted in May.
"If everything seems to be under control, you're just not going fast enough." --- Mario Andretti
Quote: And yes, it's Pridmore 62 that I have scarcely seen, in contrast to 61 which seems to be relatively common. It seems that 62 was the final die used, and only for a short period of time, before its owner (whoever that may be) may have emigrated from IOM to PEI along with the reverse die, as Pridmore suggests.
I see. I confess I'd not considered the relative scarcity of 62 v 61 - I got two of each in the same auction lot so never had to search for them individually. I had a bit of a look round last night and as you say, plenty of 61s but not a single 62.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use