Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1796 Half Cent With Pole NGC Not Suitable For Certification Please Help

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 38 / Views: 5,314Next Topic
Page: of 3
New Member

35 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2020  11:58 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add dstring26 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I have a 1796 Half Cent with Pole. I cannot find any design flaws. I believe this coin was struck using a cut down Large Cent Planchet. I believe this because the weight is slightly off the diameter is slightly wider than it should be and the thickness is slightly off as well. I believe this certain coin planchet was cut down then flattened to get the thickness causing the diameter to be slightly wider. I have sent this coin to ANACS PCGS and NGC. This coin was sent to NGC twice the second time coming back ***NOT ENCAPSULATED*** NOT SUITABLE FOR CERTIFICATION. I also trusted a local coin dealer to send the coin to colleagues of theirs. The colleagues dated the copper back to the 1700s and offered me several thousand for the coin. I do not have the exact weights thickness or diameter. The coin is currently with its co-owner locked away. I will not be able to get any more pictures or get the specs until early 2021 when I meet with the co-owner again. If anyone can help me just by what I have mentioned here and the several pictures I have supplied that would be a great help thank you. FYI this is not an EDWARDS COPY the the CA in AMERICA is too far apart to be the EDWARDS COPY. The Image that shows NGCs Label is the coin but the angle plastic sleeve and lighting make it look flat.
1796-Half-Cent-With-Pole-NGC-Not-Suitable-For-Certification-Please-Help
1796-Half-Cent-With-Pole-NGC-Not-Suitable-For-Certification-Please-Help
1796-Half-Cent-With-Pole-NGC-Not-Suitable-For-Certification-Please-Help
1796-Half-Cent-With-Pole-NGC-Not-Suitable-For-Certification-Please-Help

*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
Pillar of the Community
That Coin Dude's Avatar
United States
1427 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  12:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add That Coin Dude to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like a metal detector find, and possibly too damaged to grade. Or has ED and will do nothing but rot if encapsulated.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Zurie's Avatar
United States
5672 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  12:30 am  Show Profile   Check Zurie's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Zurie to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You mentioned that the weight and thickness were both slightly "off". Does that mean higher or lower than expected? And what were the opinions from ANACS, PCGS, and NGC the first time around?
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  12:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If its an odd planchet just seek out the Half Cent guru's currently at EAC and have him give an opinion. Then submit to an EAC run auction raw ... JPL
New Member
35 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  12:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dstring26 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The First time around ANACS, NGC, and PCGS all said Undecided. I called PCGS after I got that verdict and they said basically the graders could not come to a unanimous decision. Also the coins thickness was less than it should have been and the diameter wider than it should have been. but not by much.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
GrapeCollects's Avatar
United States
8938 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  12:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GrapeCollects to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Basically it means that they can't call it genuine but can't call it not genuine. They won't touch a coin like that. Too much liability.
New Member
35 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  12:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dstring26 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I was thinking about sending it back through. I do not know how much research they do. I sent the coin to the grading companies through dealers and not by myself. I looked at the ANACS form today and if I'm not mistaken it looks like if you pay more they will spend the time to do more research and in depth grading? Correct me if I am wrong.
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  08:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Your wrong. Contact EAC - you and your coin NEED technical assistance before proceeding to auction. Worst case - Its an off-planchet with environmental damage. I own the finest 1 Real General Vargas (Mexico) piece both for 1811 and 1812 based on Stacks/Sedwick/Heritage/Ponterio/Superior catalogs and it was called VF - Environmental Damage (incorrectly - BTW) but you don't see me worrying <BG>.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  09:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
EAC is definitely the way to go.



to the CCF!
New Member
35 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  1:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dstring26 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm not trying to sell it I just want to know if it is real. I don't even care if the put a grade to it I will grade it myself. If they were to grade it too that would be way better, but I'd settle for just letting me know if it is real or not. I will contact EAC next week.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Keith67's Avatar
United States
6563 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  1:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Keith67 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
and offered me several thousand for the coin.


TAKE IT
Pillar of the Community
jimbucks's Avatar
United States
4692 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  2:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jimbucks to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What is contact info for EAC?
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  2:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Google Early American Coppers club.
Valued Member
1796NoPole's Avatar
United States
286 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  2:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1796NoPole to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have been summoned... kinda.

I think this coin is in amazing condition for a 1796, and that certainly is not the reason it wasn't certified. Rather, it looks to me like an old electrotype. The surfaces are considerably lumpy and I don't see the denticles. Check for a seam on the edge.
New Member
35 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  8:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dstring26 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Questions about the Electrotype Copy.

Is the Electrotype Copy only in the No Pole Variety

I have the With Pole

Is the Electrotype Copy magnetic? I believe it would be using a metal core.

The coin I have is not magnetic.
Valued Member
Canada
235 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2020  10:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add whatdowehavehere to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
In the '70s-'80s, we could cherrypick DB Half Cents that had fat squared edges and overflowing rims. For years, we thought "cut downs" and we found them for 1804 (incl. a C-5 in monster XF, and a C-9, d/s right at where the break forms in LIBERTY)-05-06 (esp a very nice 06 S6St that was stolen from me). Then, I found an 1807 that had half fat square etc, and half normal rims and edges: it had inexplicably gone through the upsetting mill only half way. Yours looks like it never made it through the mill, just like the others. If I'm not mistaken there is an EAC/Penny Wise article about it. There were a few that had thick, choppy edges and no evidence of upsetting. Those wer were sure were on cut-down planchets-the edges were almost multi-sided. If your has a square, uninterrupted edge, then it may be unmilled. If the edge looks sheared in places, well... it'd be a bell-ringer if it's genuine
Edited by whatdowehavehere
12/10/2020 11:23 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 38 / Views: 5,314Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums