Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop CCF Members on eBay! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: What If? 1957 State Commemorative Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,201Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 07/01/2021  11:39 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Back in 2014, I posted a What If? about a failed 1960s commemorative coinage bill that would have resulted in a program that issued a circulating commemorative half dollar for each state in the order it joined the Union. The coins would have continued to feature the recently-started use of John F. Kennedy's portrait on their obverse, but with a new reverse design for each state. I viewed the proposed program as a distant forerunner to the State Quarters Program of 1999-2008.

That potential program, however, was not the first time a bill was proposed in Congress that would have resulted in a commemorative coin for most, if not all, of the US States.

In 1957, Senator Edward John Tyhe (R-MN) introduced a bill in the Senate that called for "the Director of the Mint to honor one request from the legislature of each State for a commemorative coin." Its language was very "loose" in that it did not specify an order for the coins to be issued, thus allowing for an ad hoc release schedule based on the date of "an event of particular significance or any matter of interest to any such legislature, or its authorized committee." The bill did, at least, limit each State to one coin.

The bill also lacked a specification of which denomination was to be used for the commemorative coins. Considering its date of introduction, it would seem likely that the 50-cent coin would have been the "go to" denomination, but it seems just as likely that with the freedom to choose, some states would have opted for some other denomination in order to be different and set their coin apart from the norm.

The bill did require the states to pay for all costs associated with the dies and manufacturing of the coins, but did not place any limits on the number of coins that could be requested by a state or on when/how often a state could request its coins. Based on the language that gave the individual states the authority to decide how many coins were to be produced, it appears the bill was envisioning not-intended-for-circulation (NIFC) coins for collectors vs. regular circulation pieces.

The coinage proposal was referred to the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency upon its introduction, but was not seriously considered - it died for lack of action. If the bill had passed and its language hadn't been tightened up in Committee, I could imagine a very messy program and one that had the potential of being very frustrating to collectors. IMO, it was a good thing this one didn't go anywhere in Congress.

It appears to my eyes, that, with this bill, Senator Tyhe was making one more attempt at getting a coin issued for Minnesota's 1958 Statehood Centennial. In the previous Congress, he, along with several Representatives in the House, introduced a bill calling for commemorative half dollars to mark the State's centennial. None of the bills gained traction, however, and all died quietly. Had this new bill been authorized, I'm sure Minnesota would have been among the first, if not the first, in line for a coin!

You can read about the 1960s bill I referenced above here:

- What If? 1960's Statehood Half Dollar Series.


For other of my What If? posts, check out: Read More: Commems Collection.




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187582 Posts
 Posted 07/01/2021  3:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Fascinating!


Quote:
The bill also lacked a specification of which denomination was to be used for the commemorative coins... it seems just as likely that... some states would have opted for some other denomination in order to be different and set their coin apart from the norm.
Silver State Dollars!
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 07/01/2021  3:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First I've read about that, thanks!
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3622 Posts
 Posted 07/01/2021  9:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great post! I never knew about this proposal.

Would "any denomination" include classic, but lapsed, denominations? I would have loved a commemorative half, two, three, or Twenty Cent coin. (Why be normal?)
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15386 Posts
 Posted 07/02/2021  05:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks commems, fascinating post.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12252 Posts
 Posted 07/02/2021  07:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@All: Thanks much! I always appreciate the feedback and engagement!

Quote:
Silver State Dollars!

Quote:
Would "any denomination" include classic, but lapsed, denominations?

The bill did provide the Director of the Mint and Secretary of the Treasury discretion in terms of the size, weight and composition of the coins struck, so I would imagine that requests for gold coins and obsolete denominations would have been refused. I'm thinking that quarters, half dollars and silver dollars would have been the most popular denomination/coin requests. But that's conjecture on my part!



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Pillar of the Community
Raised on rock's Avatar
United States
634 Posts
 Posted 07/02/2021  09:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Raised on rock to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Minnesota loses out again. Maybe a good loss.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,201Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums