| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,004 |
|
|
New Member
United States
18 Posts |
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5240 Posts |
Before a determination is made I would like to see close ups of States, The letter N in UNUM and the letter Q in QUARTER.
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
Jim0815 I know it is not a type B m-g/// I didn't think there was a serif on the N it's there. It was suggested It was a cull lamination. Its mint state.
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
  Jim0815 here's a couple closeups you asked about and Thank-you everyone at coincommunity
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
 Left it is 1964 and Right it is 1972. If we compare your coin with those we come to the conclusion that your coin it is an legitimate design of 1972D. The best way to look for it is the word QUARTER. Been an clad, properly is name de-lamination, which could happened during the strike, like also after. for explanation: LAMINATION it is the process of the union of two different materials by different processes(ex press, glue, electro, etc.) DE-LAMINATIOS it is the separation of the two materials resulted from processes of Lamination. Regarding the markers you talk about, please can you put focus on that parts?
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
Silviosi I have made red dots my on the reverse pic of my coin. These markers are for 1964D ddrs see any similarities?  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
To answer : NO You look far behind. Is no way to be use a die from 1964 silver coins in 1972. the dies are destroyed second month of the following year. The masters do not has those marks. It is just an optical illusion to you.
Your coin fit perfectly the 1972. An hint?: OK = The eagle is smaller then the strike in 1964.
except behind the scull where I presume it is a small crack, not big premium, your coins do not has nothing out of common.
Your de-lamination, in order to be confirm it is genuine, must be certified by a lab. specialize on those type of de-laminations. Yours it is the fourth I see I one week. The other three was simulated de-lamination. OH, all has same location and approx. same form and dimension.
You take your own conclusions and please do not try to make us see what we do not see. Thanks.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
103862 Posts |
Edited by Dearborn 01/06/2022 07:57 am
|
|
New Member
 United States
18 Posts |
Dearborn Yes, It was posted last week and apologize was having trouble navigating site.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,004 |
|