| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,000 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
1891 S   *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. *** |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
I'd like to see the obverse clearer if you could just take the photo a bit closer to the coin so it is in full frame. It helps to balance the phone on something so it doesn't blur at all. (Sorry if I'm teaching a granny to suck eggs here), just want to grade it properly for you. It looks Ms63 from what I'm seeing so far.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
366 Posts |
hope this helps.........  |
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
It is very lustrous and bright, and the marks to the cheek look light. Some bag marks, I think it would grade MS63+, unsure if it makes MS64. It's a very lovely example and I like it a lot.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Tough life in the bag; I'll say MS-62.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
nice sharp strike as it should be for this year. nice overall luster. the hits above the eye, obverse field marks and scrapes on the cheek are going to play a big role in the grade. I've seen worse slabbed at 63. I'm going with 63. just too many marks to go higher
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4471 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
MS62-. That mark on the left obverse field is a killer.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
Those hits in the Obv. field hardly show with coin in hand. The 91-S will likely end up in my type set.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,000 |
|
Posted 05/04/2022 2:30 pm
