| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,892 |
|
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
I received this 1797 Half Dime (13 stars) from my dad who recently passed. The Red Book shows it's worth about $1250 in good, but this one has a hole. I know a hole would mean that the coin is damaged, but I also know that this is an extremely valuable coin. Would this fetch any decent money even in this condition? 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
735 Posts |
pictures of both sides would help Not a very nice looking coin but even with the hole and apparent damage / wear it may fetch $600-800+ but I'm no expert. Edit - didnt notice it was a 13 stars, so maybe a little more then what I said.
I've been collecting for a couple years... Favorite Coin's are Standing Liberty quarters, Working on my type set | Coffee, Corvettes, Coins & the CCF what could be better?
Edited by Jakes Coins 01/12/2023 10:49 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
Yes, there is a market. Maybe its the only 13 "affordable" 13-star out there for someone into that level of detail. Or an entry level-type collector willing to overlook the damage just for the thrill of saying they have one. The market won't be large, and its NOT the side of the market famous for driving up prices. It might take some time to find a buyer.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
I'm a Half Dime fan, but my interest is capped bust Half Dimes (1829-1837) so I don't know much about these early Half Dimes. I do, however, have the Logan-McCloskey book "Federal Half Dimes 1792-1837." There is only one recognized die marriage that year that has 13 stars - it's the LM-4. Regarding rarity, the book says: "R-6. A rare die marriage that is usually seen well worn. Extremely rare in mint state." An R-6 means that there's an estimated 13-30 examples extant. So, even though it's got some miles on it, it's a special coin. Caveat: I usually try to attribute Half Dimes before I opine about them, and in the case of this one, I don't see enough detail (nor do I see the reverse) so I couldn't attribute it. But I'll assume your dad passed on good info to you and you're confident. Either way, the other three die marriages (LM-1 thru LM-3) are, respectively, R3, R4, and R5 - so none is what you'd call "common."
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
Here is the reverse... 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
@Crazy Monkey, thanks for sharing the reverse pic. I'm sold on the LM-4 attribution. As I looked closer, the placement of the stars on this Obverse 3 is waaay different from the first two obverses that year, the 15-star Obv 1 and the 16-star Obv 2. The reverse you uploaded is clearly Reverse E. Pickup points are clear and include the branch stem touching the last A in AMERICA.
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
bikergeek, thanks for the info. Are you saying that there are only 13 to 30 known examples of the LM-4?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
That R6 was an estimate. The rarity number could go down if/as more LM-4s are discovered. (R5 is 31-75 estimated extant). I saw that the Logan McCloskey book (published 1998) called it R6. And the 2019 Half Dime census published by the John Reich Collectors Society (JRCS) also maintained the R6 estimate. However, a search of Heritage Auctions to see if they had any low-grade examples like yours (they don't) show that they were calling the marriage R5, starting in about 2010. And that's looking reasonable to me - simply judging from the number of different 1797 LM-4's they've offered in the last 20-some years. https://coins.ha.com/c/search-resul...veTab-071515This is a VERY timely conversation for me to be involved in, as I'm currently assisting the primary author of the upcoming 2023 JRCS Half Dime census, and I intend to discuss the possible downgrading of this marriage to R5. And if anyone joins the JRCS, you'll get the "JR Journal" when that census is published (April I think). (Anyone is welcome to message me with any questions about that). Thanks for sharing your story and images! -Sean
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
Thanks bikergeek. I wasn't sure I originally read your comment right when you said that it was so rare. I didn't believe it was that rare, but I do recall my dad saying it was a special coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15463 Posts |
 to the CCF. Interesting discussion - good that we have bikergeek as an expert!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the CCF!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
417 Posts |
I don't know what this would go for, on ebay I sure think it would get plenty of bids and run way up into the hundreds even without being some rare die variety. But more so I just want to raise a toast to Bikergeek who seems quite the maestro. Good to hear from you, keep it coming!
Edited by TimNH 01/13/2023 12:56 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
90 Posts |
TimNH and Nickelsearcher, your words are very kind. I have come to understand why this is a community.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
I would recommend submitting the images to a respectable auction house like Heritage Auctions for a free estimate. Even if it doesn't meet their minimum of $5,000, you will hopefully still get an estimate of its value.
|
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
I purchased a PCGS certified 1797 13-star Half Dime, plugged, Good details, at a Stacks & Bowers auction two years ago. I won the bid at $600, plus $120 buyer's premium, for a total of $720. Link to PCGS verification cert: https://www.PCGS.com/cert/83134679Personally, I thought my winning bid amount was darn cheap, considering the rarity of the coin. No telling what you'd get for the coin now. Seems it getting harder and harder to find/collect the rarer Half Dimes, especially in decent condition.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11896 Posts |
Seems really interesting that both the OP's coin and Helotian's coin seem to have the hole in almost the same location. Hole seems located to show the eagle side when worn around the neck. That's what shows upright.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,892 |
|