Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2026 United States Mint Semiquincentennial Silver Proof Set Available On June 11

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 136 / Views: 4,112Next Topic
Page: of 10
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188924 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  09:43 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
What is illegal about these designs?
Allegedly, the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee did not have an opportunity to review the designs.

From the link above:
Quote:
The quarters' authorizing statute, Public Law No. 116-330, is clear that "each of the designs authorized under this subsection shall be selected by the Secretary after consultation with [sic] Commission of Fine Arts and review by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee [emphasis added]." Nevertheless, the Committee never reviewed, nor was given the opportunity to review, many of the designs, including:
https://www.ccac.gov/system/files/2...26_-_508.pdf
Pillar of the Community
United States
769 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  1:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Boba Debt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I read the law but couldn't find any information on whether the new designs were reviewed by other members of the advisory board or if there was any follow-up to the original letter.

One interesting part is that Public Law No. 116-330 requires "at least one of the quarter dollar designs" to be "emblematic of a woman's or women's contribution to the birth of Nation or the Declaration of Independence or any other monumental moments in American history."

It would have been nice to see a quarter dedicated to Betsy Ross instead of the Gettysburg Address.


Edited by Boba Debt
06/19/2026 3:34 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
769 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  2:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Boba Debt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
*** Artificial Intelligence (AI) removed per rules. https://www.coincommunity.com/forum...sp#rulesid26 ***
Read More: https://goccf.com/t/490235



Since MS Copilot's summary was removed, I'll sum up what I learned about Kellen Hoard from the internet.

He was a young political activist whose main social media focus was more about his activism than coins.

More experienced members of the CCAC did not support him, and the U.S. Mint ignored him.


I prefer the new designs over the original ones, so I'm glad the Mint ignored him.
Edited by Boba Debt
06/19/2026 2:48 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
769 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  2:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Boba Debt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
EDIT, content removed by ME

This seems more like a discussion for a different forum
Edited by Boba Debt
06/19/2026 2:38 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188924 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  3:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There is a link in your edited reply that explains why AI is not allowed.

https://goccf.com/t/490235
Pillar of the Community
United States
769 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  4:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Boba Debt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I didn't want to bring this up in this thread because I didn't want to derail it, but I'd be remiss if I didn't at least say this.


It seems like enforcement only happens when someone disagrees with the content.


I've seen plenty of AI images and text posted in threads that wasn't removed.



Edited by Boba Debt
06/19/2026 4:30 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188924 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  5:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I've seen plenty of AI images and text posted in threads that wasn't removed.
We try, but we do not catch it all on our own. Please use the Report this Post to the Staff link at the lower right of the post so we can take action.
Pillar of the Community
United States
769 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2026  6:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Boba Debt to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Much like I recognized the value of Google in its early days, I also see the value of and have no issue with its use.

From experience, I believe AI will become mainstream and accepted even faster than search engines.



BUT back to the topic.

This isn't the first time the Mint has bypassed the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee's review, though I haven't found and old topics were members complained about it.

It should be noted that the law requires all coins to carry the dual date "1776-2026," yet the dollar doesn't, and I seem to be the only one bothered by that.

The coins are also supposed to be emblematic of the United States Semiquincentennial, the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding, but the Gettysburg Address quarter doesn't meet that standard, as others and I have noted.

That said, I like most of the set, especially since the Mint chose to redesign some coins.

If they had gone through the full review process, though, the release would likely have been delayed, and people would be complaining about that instead.
Edited by Boba Debt
06/20/2026 5:52 pm
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
CelticKnot's Avatar
United States
12841 Posts
 Posted 06/20/2026  10:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CelticKnot to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Mine arrived on Thursday and it looks great.

I know I sound like a broken record but unfortunately that will be the last silver proof set I buy directly from the mint with prices like this.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
Marv65's Avatar
United States
10566 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   12:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Marv65 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
From experience, I believe AI will become mainstream and accepted even faster than search engines.


I agree - AI is horrible (Or are the people that abuse it are horrible?)

"AI helped diagnose 18 children whose rare diseases had stumped doctors"
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innova...i-rcna350387
Pillar of the Community
nfine's Avatar
United States
3472 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   12:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nfine to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It should be noted that the law requires all coins to carry the dual date "1776-2026," yet the dollar doesn't, and I seem to be the only one bothered by that.


You are not the only person bothered by that. At the very least, the mint should have added the 250 privy to the obverse.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
Marv65's Avatar
United States
10566 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   12:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Marv65 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OMG - can this possibly be true?

Circulating-Style Commemoratives (Native American $1 Coin): The 2026 Native American $1 coin features a design honoring Polly Cooper sharing corn with George Washington. Because it is categorized under a separate, ongoing commemorative program, it carries the standard single year of issuance (2026) rather than the "1776-2026" dual date.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188924 Posts
 Posted Today  2H 54M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It should be noted that the law requires all coins to carry the dual date "1776-2026," yet the dollar doesn't, and I seem to be the only one bothered by that.
I am bothered by that, but mostly because edge dating has always bothered me.

Quote:
the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding, but the Gettysburg Address quarter doesn't meet that standard, as others and I have noted.
I have to believe it is because the address specifically points to the founding and how it needed to survive this test. But I will agree that is a debatable connection.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188924 Posts
Valued Member
Mojojojo's Avatar
United States
390 Posts
 Posted Today  2H 6M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mojojojo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
At the very least, the mint should have added the 250 privy to the obverse.


That is odd, considering the privy is on the American Innovation Dollars.
  Previous TopicReplies: 136 / Views: 4,112Next Topic
Page: of 10

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.45 seconds to rattle this change. Forums