Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop CCF Members on eBay! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Russia - 1 Kopeck 1788 - Mint Error/Double Strike Or Counterfeit?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 292Next Topic  
Valued Member

Poland
136 Posts
 Posted 02/12/2026  05:45 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add NumiFan to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello

This one is funny. It looks like a Russian 1 kopeck 1788 of Catherine II.
The weight and diameter doesn't match though - mine is 8.26g and 28mm while the catalogue says 10.24g and 26.5mm....

I think the obverse has double strike from the different coin. The reverse's design is strange as the horseman's head is not visible at all - so that we can call a Headless Horseman example :)

I wonder of the reverse is just a mint error causes by double strike or maybe this coin is a counterfeit from the era?

Russia---1-Kopeck-1788---Mint-Error/Double-Strike-Or-Counterfeit?
Russia---1-Kopeck-1788---Mint-Error/Double-Strike-Or-Counterfeit?
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16804 Posts
 Posted 02/12/2026  08:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Russian copper coins were often overstruck on earlier coins; the anomalies you're seeing here are a result of that overstriking.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5172 Posts
 Posted 02/12/2026  2:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add january1may to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not a double strike but an overstrike, and a pretty scarce one at that; the host coin is a Peter III 2 kopeks from 1762, and specifically a variety with misprinted letters in the denomination (the first variant on the Numista page).

Overstrikes of Catherine II 2 kopeks over Peter III 4 kopeks, and to a lesser extent of 5 kopeks over Peter III 10 kopeks, are relatively common, but 1 over 2 is much scarcer (AFAICT mostly due to much lower mintages of the original; most Peter III coins were overstruck). Very interesting coin!

Don't worry about the weight; they vary a lot for Catherine II coppers. The usual story is that those coins were tested for weight in bulk, with a large amount at once; whatever the reason, they can be quite a bit off the nominal weight (which is indeed 10.24 grams for a 1 kopek). There's also quite a bit of wear, and that probably reduced the weight further (though surely not by 20%; it must have been a lightweight coin to start with).
Valued Member
Poland
136 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2026  12:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NumiFan to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank You for so precise explanation, that's a very interesting topic.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94585 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2026  09:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gxseries to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That is a very nice overstruck coin!

As January1may said, 1788 1 kopek MM is quite scarce. I have a 1788 no mintmark but it doesn't show the overstruck feature as clearly as yours. Unfortunately it seems that there are old scratches that tried to wipe out the underlying features. If you are lucky, you might be able to see another year under it. 1762 2 kopek were meant to be overstruck over older 1 kopek coin.

Regardless I reckon it's easily 100 dollars - that rare variety would add some value despite the scratch.
My partial coin collection http://www.omnicoin.com/collection/gxseries
My numismatics articles and collection: http://www.gxseries.com/numis/numis_index.htm
Regularly updated at least once a month.
Valued Member
Poland
136 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2026  04:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NumiFan to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Indeed after close examination '62' is visible.
Thank You so much for assisting with this and also for giving a valuation.
It occurs a nice purchase as I had bought it for 25 dollars :)
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 292Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums