| Author |
Replies: 49 / Views: 6,094 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
436 Posts |
Quote: If you're vacuuming the house and there is a 1 cent coin on the ground, what do you do? What if it's a nickel? A dime? Penny: I pick it up, walk into my "coin cave" (extra bed room I do all my coin stuff in) and put it in the penny jug. Go find my wife and say something like " Babe a penny was on the floor, I could have vacuumed that up.. or one of the kids could have tried to eat it." Next time could you at least put change you find on the ground up on the counter. Nickel: I pick it up, walk into my "coin cave" and put it in the nickel jug . Go find my wife and say something like " Babe a nickel was on the floor, I could have vacuumed that up.. or one of the kids could have tried to eat it." Next time could you at least put change you find on the ground up on the counter. Dime: I pick it up, walk into my "coin cave" and put it in the dime jug . Go find my wife and say something like " Babe a dime was on the floor, I could have vacuumed that up.. or one of the kids could have tried to eat it." Next time could you at least put change you find on the ground up on the counter. Yes me and her have had conversations like that :)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
My wife throws pennys away all the time, it makes me mad.
I think getting rid of the penny and nickel and $1 bills and minting coins every other or every 3 years would save alot of money. IMO they should move to a cheaper metal too.
They could even get rid of the $5 bill like someone else posted but then they should make a $2, $3, or even a $5 coin. CAD uses the $2 coin and it works for them.
I personally think a $5 could would be neat.
I dont know how long coins last but I know that when I get a bill pre 2000 its pretty rare. coins stay around for a really long time. and if you make higher $ coins then people wount vacuum them up or throw then in a lake they will acually use them and they will stay in circulation longer.
On the flip side it would be a pain in the butt carrying a bunch of change in your pocket all the time. going shopping at the mall and getting $25 in coins back. but thats what debit and credit cards are for.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
This is another example of how inflation (government debasing currency by printing too much of it) destroys value. Coins have REAL value. INTRINSIC value based on the metal used to create them. The government makes A LOT of money on dimes, quarters, halves and dollars it creates. Yes it loses a little on pennies and nickels but I can assure you it is a drop in the bucket to the countless hundreds of millions in seignorige (value of coin above cost to make it) for the larger denominations.
The politicians of BOTH political parties are working overtime to destroy the dollar. Stealing our smaller coins value by again debasing it (as they did in 1933 with gold and 1964 with silver) is not acceptable to me regardless of what they "lose" in the transaction. They spend tens of billions bailing out banks and car companies while at the same time stealing from us the taxpayers and citizens of this country. In a nutshell NO IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE to debase my coins any more than they already have nor is it acceptable to stop creating them as they are used in daily commerce. We the people need to stand up to these politicians and remind them that it is OUR money and to respect it not debase it. Sincerely, John Leckrone
|
|
Valued Member
United States
317 Posts |
I don't think an alloy change would necessarily be a bad thing. As a collector of non-U.S. coins as well as U.S. coins,I collect and enjoy coins made of a variety of alloys. Canada's plated steel coinage holds up quite well in circulation. I'd also favor aluminium coinage. I have quite a few East German coins, and most of the ones I have are made of aluminium, and they look quite nice even in ciruclated condition. Aluminium-Bronze is another alloy I like. I've seen this used in Chilean 10 Peso coins, and it holds up quite well. I think an aluminium-bronze cent might be a good option, if it brings the costs down enough. The cent would remain a similar color, although it'd be more of a yellow than a red, and it'd hold up much better than the current Zincolns do ( I'm sure we've all seen 1980's Zinclons that are just rotting, for lack of a better word). However, the time has finally come to do away with the $1 bill, I'd say. We need to do waht Canada, the Eurozone and Turkey have done and force the use of high denomination coinage.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
473 Posts |
I agree with your comments on intrinsic value, 925dealer. The whole idea of money is that it is supposed to be worth something. But those days are gone my friend and will not be returning anytime soon. I feel nothing short of a breakup of the union could bring back silver and gold (ie real money). And even then it would be a long shot...
Anyone got an idea on the cost to produce a modern Canadian steel cent? We could call the Stealincolns...or maybe not haha
-gary
|
|
Valued Member
United States
327 Posts |
Lets get rid of the dollar bill. It costs about 7 cents each to print a dollar bill, which lasts on average about two years maximum. The average coin costs about 20 cents or so and would last about 10-15 years. How is THAT for a cost savings?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
Quote: The cent would remain a similar color, although it'd be more of a yellow than a red They could solve that by adding Red Dye #10.  Seriously, if they do anything, I have a feeling it's going to have aluminum in it, as many countries have been on that in the past when times were tough.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188121 Posts |
Quote: Quite often cashiers will just hand you a Nickel instead of a couple pennies when the change is $.04 or even $.03. That happened to me at lunch the other day. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
This is just a rehash of a proposal that has already been introduced as legislation three times in the past. It has just never passed. The politicians don't want to relinquish that power from their hands to those of the Mint even though it would make more sense because the Mint could react faster to market changes. Quote: Aluminium-bronze might look great, but it's mostly made of copper (typically around 90%), so that alloy is definitely out. Don't count on that. That is 90% copper BY WEIGHT and aluminum is much less dense than copper. It wouldn't work for the cent, but it would possibly be practical for the other denominations in an 80/20 alloy The best choices for the cent would be copper plated aluminum or copper plated steel. I would recommend the copper plated aluminum choice since it would produce a lot more cents per pound of metal and the softer aluminum would be much easier on the dies. As far as stopping production of the cents for a year, if you do you might as well stop them for good. I seriously beliee that if you stopped for a year within a couple months there would be a severe shortage of cents and people would start hoarding those that remained. To counter that shortage you would find businesses going ahead and implementing rounding to the nearest 5 cents on the final total. Once that is accomplished there would be no reason to return to cent production. To continue production annually but just a reduced level would only prolong the pain and delay the introduction of rounding
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
I think there are plenty of cents out there. Since 1983, there have been 269.3 Billion of those things minted (not including 2009). That is just about $10 each person in pennies. No, I do not foresee a shortage if we stopped minting them for a year, or even 5 years.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
327 Posts |
Quote: I think there are plenty of cents out there. Since 1983, there have been 269.3 Billion of those things minted (not including 2009). That is just about $10 each person in pennies. No, I do not foresee a shortage if we stopped minting them for a year, or even 5 years. Problem is many, many of the Zincoln cents minted are literally falling apart even after a year or two. If you metal detect it is common to find copper cents 50 years old or older in spendable condition, but next to them find five year old Zincolns that are little more than black crumbly disks. Zinc does NOT hold up like copper, or even steel. Maybe copper washed steel like the Euro cents is the way to go?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
You also have to understand the thinking of the general public. Sure there are plenty of cents out there, in bottles and jars, boxes etc. But not in the actual streams of commerce. As a general rule the public will NOT bother taking them back to the banks. Then as the supplies in the banks start to dry up (because they will continue to go from the banks, to the people, to the hoards, shortages WILL occur. Businesses will start asking people to use exact change, eventually the banks and businesses will, for awhile, even offer to pay a premium over face value to get cents. Some people will then redeem their cents, but nowhere near enough. Other people will see the scarcity of the cents and the premiums offered as a reason to start hoarding them hoping for even higher premiums in the future. The net results is an even faster disappearance of the cents from commerce. Rather than continue to pay ever higher premiums to get cents the businesses will eventually begin rounding.
I know what I am talking about. I've seen this happen at least three times during my lifetime. ach time the only thing that stopped it was a greatly increased output of cents from the mint. And it doesn't take that long for the shortages to begin once coin production slows or stops. Why do you think they have to make billions of new cents every year and why are the normally the first new coins seen in circulation each year? It's be cause the Fed DOESN'T normally have that many in storage. To a very large extent the cent is a one way one time use coin, and if production stops shortages begin shortly thereafter.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
207 Posts |
yeahhhhh!  plastic coins  They will cut the cost of coin production but not any of obama's ear mark programs or any other entitlement program that is going to put the US in a debt  within the next 5 years
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
I think changing the alloys would be the most likely thing to occur.
Eliminating the dollar bill and other bills, in short, will be disastrous for Massachusetts and other states that provide the paper, ink and technology to print banknotes. Currently, the $1 bill I think occupies 45-50% of the total pieces of banknotes issued in the United States, and because of its low value, it has to be reprinted... A LOT. So, if the one dollar bill is not issued anymore, that would destroy a large part of those local economies (like Crane Co, which is located in small Dalton, MA. No senator or congressperson would want that on their conscience.
Other countries that have changed their small "change" into coins can do that because their currency system is not dependent on a representative congress, but a central bank. Our federal reserve doesn't have the constitutional right to change our money, so that's why the congress has to deal with it. Whether or not that's a good idea, it'll have to depend who's for and against the fed and on what grounds.
Anyways, I think in 1 year or so we will be seeing steel coins. Although it would carve out a large part of the revenue from Jarden Zinc and other nickle/copper suppliers, at least it would help another American company.
One more thing... I think there's going to be some more opposition against eliminating the dollar bill because it's, at least the way I think, the most recognizable American currency other than the $100 bill. Do you know why the new series colored notes still have the old 19th century font and typography? I've read on the BEP site that the new notes have to remain "distinctly American." Perhaps that would still keep the dollar from being eliminated and more boring designs to keep coming our way.
As much as I would like to see polymer notes, I think the US wouldn't agree to it because the polymer is supplied by Australia and I think for every note we print, we would have to give the RBA and CSIRO some licensing fees or something of the like. c'mon DuPont! Just develop a currency polymer! And no, we don't want Tyvek anymore.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
790 Posts |
Alright, here's a really novel solution to our coinage problems. Look what Nicaragua did when their coins got too expensive to make. http://www.banknotes.com/NI167.jpg(just checked the link, guess you've gotta pretend it leads to a pic of a 1 centavo banknote) A great way to "save" money on the cost of production of our lowest valued coins. Also a great way to prevent hoarding! Sounds like just the short-sighted thinking I'd expect this year as all the senators are worrying about reelection. By the way, though this bill is a little bit old (1991) it has a current value of about 1/20 of a US cent.
Edited by Jays-Dad 02/05/2010 09:54 am
|
| |
Replies: 49 / Views: 6,094 |