| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,860 |
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
96
Edited by Adam_E
05/24/2010 9:50 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
8 Posts |
mods, can you please move this to the main forum? thanks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
I see a 6. Quote:Q: Greetings! This is a 1798; S-167 variety. Die crack through 8 in date and from forehead to rim. Mine is here for comparison: http://www.largecents.net/collection/coinpics/s167 .jpg Best wishes, Tom Deck EAC... Continue reading A: Thank you very much! I will edit the listing. By no means am I an expert but based on the photos I cannot see a die crack through a #8. However the die gouge (if thats what it is on a coin this old) extending from Libertys eye to the rim at 2:00 appears to be on the coin you purchased. I cannot tell if the reverse Cud over ST is on your coin. It may be there. It may just be worn. Edited by JimR
05/24/2010 10:10 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
573 Posts |
That is definitely NOT a 1796. I believe that is a 1798 S-167 as evidenced by the die crack on the reverse through the E in UNITED. This one shares the obverse with S-166 but the reverse of the S-166 has a crack through the fraction that is not present on yours. The S-167 normally shows a Cud above the first T on STATES, but it looks to be worn away on yours. Many of the other markers are also worn away, but the die crack on the E is a dead giveaway. Matt |
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
thanks for the opinions. I just really dont think its a 98, if it is a 96 its worth a lot more.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
573 Posts |
c22p - I matched up your coin with a number of the Sheldon varieties and it matches none of the 1796s but matches up very well with the 1798 S-167. Like I stated in my first post, the amount of wear on yours erased a number of the die markers, but there's enough detail to tell that it is a 1798.
Matt
|
|
Valued Member
United States
407 Posts |
It's a '98. The tail you see is on the top loop of 8 making it look like a 6. The bottom loop of the 8 is worn away, aqs are the rest of the numbers.
I have a '98 also. Nice to see another one! And yes, that's good deal. Mine is in better condition but I paid a lot more!
Steve
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
Thanks a lot you guys, 1798 it is. Seemed like a great deal, but its worth it to me regardless.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
I also believe it is an S-167.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1934 Posts |
I think you got a good deal. I think it's a 98, too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
573 Posts |
Here's a picture of an S-167. You can see the die crack on the obverse from Y to the eye, and the reverse on the T. Both match yours.  Matt |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
No question 1798 S-167. Crack from eye to the rim is clear and as STJoe said the crack through the E in UNITED to the leaf below the D is clearly visible.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,860 |
|
Posted 05/24/2010 9:57 pm
