Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Classic Coins Are So Much More Appealing... Imo

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 36 / Views: 3,739Next Topic
Page: of 3
Bedrock of the Community
Bryan1315's Avatar
United States
14454 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  01:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bryan1315 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know if I could say no one has the skills to make a "good" design now, they would definitely do it allot differently. Like with computers instead of paper and pencil but there are a few real nice looking commemoratives that have been created but they are few and far between, most look either to plain or way to complicated and jumbled up since they are just a click away from adding things to the image
Pillar of the Community
Moe145's Avatar
United States
8904 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  08:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Moe145 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
there are a few real nice looking commemoratives that have been created





and some of the US States Quarters I thought turned out very well and a number of the current National Parks Quarters are pretty cool too.


That being said, Classic US Coin design is the best!
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188770 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  10:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I started by collecting coins from circulation because that is what I could afford, and given my age that implied modern coins. I have a sentimental attachment to the modern coins, but I have always seen beauty in the classics. Once I was able to afford them, I began working on a Dansco 7070 and a custom Dansco with Indian Head cents, Buffalo nickels, and Mercury dimes. The custom IHC-BN-MD album is fast becoming a favourite.

Of course, for personal (i.e. political) reasons, I prefer the images of Liberty to the effigies that grace our coins today.
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  10:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I really don't care for the modern coinage, and I define as modern anything made with a steam press or later.

As for artists with the talent to create new quality designs equal to that of the classic designs, sure they exist. But it really doesn't matter because even the great designers of the past could not have made their designs work with the restrictions placed on the coinage of today. Their designs were struck in a softer metal, at slower speed, and with higher relief. Take Fraser's majestic Buffalo nickel, and reduce the relief by two thirds and it really isn't going to look that good. Same goes for the other classic designs. The Mint artist infusion program is using artists trained in 2 dimensional media because for all practical purposes coins today ARE two dimensional. The designs have height and width, but no thickness. The relief on todays coins is measured in ten thousandths of an inch.
Valued Member
General Tso's Avatar
United States
341 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  10:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add General Tso to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Classic for sure. Although on the classic commemoratives I'd say, for me, it's 50/50.
Valued Member
Crow's Avatar
United States
63 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  10:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crow to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Of course, for personal (i.e. political) reasons, I prefer the images of Liberty to the effigies that grace our coins today. -jbuck


I feel the same way; images of individuals don't belong on coins, not even if they're people we like.
Edited by Crow
04/20/2011 10:53 am
Pillar of the Community
delaner's Avatar
United States
870 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  1:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add delaner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"The modern age is never the golden age."

There have been many excerpts posted about how everyone interested in the subject absolutely abhors the most recent numismatic additions.

I don't have a problem with any of the current coins. In fact, the Lincoln shield to me is strikingly attractive. Unfortunately, the QC at the mint is pretty low, so finding nice ones is tough! Also, I suppose I'm alone but I find the old Washington quarter to be among the most beautiful coins ever made. The eagle on the reverse is just wonderful! Another modern issue is the remake of the St Gaudens. The ultra-high relief they're able to achieve makes the coin look astounding.

Oh, and another - a couple of the recent Jefferson nickels - they're fantastic!

Certainly, the modern coins don't have the "aged with character" appeal. But I think the modern designs are beautiful in their own way. I love the capped bust series, especially when aged well, but frankly the bust isn't all that attractive. The Seated Liberty coins are beautiful in their own right, but the design isn't particularly smashing. The Barber coins are cool, but not atrociously attractive to my eye.
Valued Member
HalfDollarDave's Avatar
United States
79 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  1:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add HalfDollarDave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I find quite a few older coins uite ugly (Morgans have that emaciated eagle on the back [no offense to anyone who collects them], the first time I saw a Barber halve I thought it was a man on front, etc), but the craftmanship is far superior. I also hate how flat recent coins seem, especially those in the last few years. I know the clad coins make it harder for them to be much higher relief, but if you take a look at a 1970's dime and a 2010 dime there is a huge difference. I also think modern designs have been around for far too long, part of the attraction to classic coins for me was that they only lasted for so long before they switched (with the exception of Morgans). To really complete a date/MM collection of LMC's would take over 300 coins to complete. I also think that the new coin compositions are mediocre replacements for the silver and copper compositions, but I can understand why it changed.
Valued Member
jimineez's Avatar
United States
287 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  2:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jimineez to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Classic for sure, but I agree that some of the commemoratives of the past 25 years struck in gold and silver have been quite nice!
Pillar of the Community
jpsned's Avatar
United States
2207 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  5:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jpsned to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
We can all hope for classical-style designing to return, but chances are slim to none that they will. Reason being is that somebody in Congress would have to enable a bill to get the process rolling, and that would involve advocating taking a president off a coin. And I don't think any politician wants to be known as the one who did that.
Valued Member
Crow's Avatar
United States
63 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2011  6:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crow to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, they could introduce a new denomination. Bring back the 2 cent piece, with a new classical-style design. Then later on they could retire the penny. Yeah, probably not going to happen, but we can dream can't we
Pillar of the Community
delaner's Avatar
United States
870 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2011  02:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add delaner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I retract what I said about CBH's. I just looked at another one in the grading forum, and that's one danged pretty design!
Pillar of the Community
United States
511 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2011  07:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 3stooges to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Give me the classics, both in U.S. and world coins.
Pillar of the Community
nod2003's Avatar
United States
3294 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2011  08:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nod2003 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I like the classics. The modern junk was designed by a comittee and looks like it.
Pillar of the Community
Bizybackson's Avatar
United States
1817 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2011  08:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bizybackson to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sort of like comparing apples to oranges. The designs are reflective of the then state of the art technology of the era that spawned it. A wise old collector once said to me, "The modern junk of today is tomorrow's classics."
  Previous TopicReplies: 36 / Views: 3,739Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums