| Author |
Replies: 36 / Views: 3,739 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I don't know if I could say no one has the skills to make a "good" design now, they would definitely do it allot differently. Like with computers instead of paper and pencil but there are a few real nice looking commemoratives that have been created but they are few and far between, most look either to plain or way to complicated and jumbled up since they are just a click away from adding things to the image
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
Quote: there are a few real nice looking commemoratives that have been created  and some of the US States Quarters I thought turned out very well and a number of the current National Parks Quarters are pretty cool too. That being said, Classic US Coin design is the best!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
I started by collecting coins from circulation because that is what I could afford, and given my age that implied modern coins. I have a sentimental attachment to the modern coins, but I have always seen beauty in the classics. Once I was able to afford them, I began working on a Dansco 7070 and a custom Dansco with Indian Head cents, Buffalo nickels, and Mercury dimes. The custom IHC-BN-MD album is fast becoming a favourite. Of course, for personal (i.e. political) reasons, I prefer the images of Liberty to the effigies that grace our coins today. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I really don't care for the modern coinage, and I define as modern anything made with a steam press or later. As for artists with the talent to create new quality designs equal to that of the classic designs, sure they exist. But it really doesn't matter because even the great designers of the past could not have made their designs work with the restrictions placed on the coinage of today. Their designs were struck in a softer metal, at slower speed, and with higher relief. Take Fraser's majestic Buffalo nickel, and reduce the relief by two thirds and it really isn't going to look that good. Same goes for the other classic designs. The Mint artist infusion program is using artists trained in 2 dimensional media because for all practical purposes coins today ARE two dimensional. The designs have height and width, but no thickness. The relief on todays coins is measured in ten thousandths of an inch.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
341 Posts |
Classic for sure. Although on the classic commemoratives I'd say, for me, it's 50/50.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
63 Posts |
Quote: Of course, for personal (i.e. political) reasons, I prefer the images of Liberty to the effigies that grace our coins today. -jbuck I feel the same way; images of individuals don't belong on coins, not even if they're people we like.
Edited by Crow 04/20/2011 10:53 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
870 Posts |
"The modern age is never the golden age." There have been many excerpts posted about how everyone interested in the subject absolutely abhors the most recent numismatic additions. I don't have a problem with any of the current coins. In fact, the Lincoln shield to me is strikingly attractive. Unfortunately, the QC at the mint is pretty low, so finding nice ones is tough! Also, I suppose I'm alone but I find the old Washington quarter to be among the most beautiful coins ever made. The eagle on the reverse is just wonderful! Another modern issue is the remake of the St Gaudens. The ultra-high relief they're able to achieve makes the coin look astounding. Oh, and another - a couple of the recent Jefferson nickels - they're fantastic! Certainly, the modern coins don't have the "aged with character" appeal. But I think the modern designs are beautiful in their own way. I love the capped bust series, especially when aged well, but frankly the bust isn't all that attractive. The Seated Liberty coins are beautiful in their own right, but the design isn't particularly smashing. The Barber coins are cool, but not atrociously attractive to my eye.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
I find quite a few older coins uite ugly (Morgans have that emaciated eagle on the back [no offense to anyone who collects them], the first time I saw a Barber halve I thought it was a man on front, etc), but the craftmanship is far superior. I also hate how flat recent coins seem, especially those in the last few years. I know the clad coins make it harder for them to be much higher relief, but if you take a look at a 1970's dime and a 2010 dime there is a huge difference. I also think modern designs have been around for far too long, part of the attraction to classic coins for me was that they only lasted for so long before they switched (with the exception of Morgans). To really complete a date/MM collection of LMC's would take over 300 coins to complete. I also think that the new coin compositions are mediocre replacements for the silver and copper compositions, but I can understand why it changed.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
287 Posts |
Classic for sure, but I agree that some of the commemoratives of the past 25 years struck in gold and silver have been quite nice!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2207 Posts |
We can all hope for classical-style designing to return, but chances are slim to none that they will. Reason being is that somebody in Congress would have to enable a bill to get the process rolling, and that would involve advocating taking a president off a coin. And I don't think any politician wants to be known as the one who did that.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
63 Posts |
Well, they could introduce a new denomination. Bring back the 2 cent piece, with a new classical-style design. Then later on they could retire the penny. Yeah, probably not going to happen, but we can dream can't we 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
870 Posts |
I retract what I said about CBH's. I just looked at another one in the grading forum, and that's one danged pretty design!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
511 Posts |
Give me the classics, both in U.S. and world coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
I like the classics. The modern junk was designed by a comittee and looks like it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1817 Posts |
Sort of like comparing apples to oranges. The designs are reflective of the then state of the art technology of the era that spawned it. A wise old collector once said to me, "The modern junk of today is tomorrow's classics." 
|
| |
Replies: 36 / Views: 3,739 |