| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 6,671 |
|
|
|
New Member
United States
18 Posts |
Can you post the total of each coin that you found out of those 250,000 nickels?
I would love to see how your numbers compare to my much smaller finds.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
Great info nickelsearcher! I think I'm leaning toward becoming a nickel specialist myself because my finds have been so interesting lately with all the doubled dies and Buffaloes I've found.
@perfessor: The main thing is to take the coins back to a different bank than the one you got them from, partly to look like less of a jerk, but also to make sure they don't come back around to you so quickly. 10 rolls is nothing - lots of people bring that much in all the time from cleaning out their coin jars, and some zealous roll hunters bring in thousands of dollars of half dollars at one time (banks HATE half dollars), so your handful of nickels won't even be noticed.
I get a box of nickels and a box of dimes twice a week from one bank near my house (each box has 50 rolls), then dump them at two different branches (one near work and the other near home) of a different bank. It's never been enough for them to be bothered by it. One teller at my dump bank today commented that I was saving them money because I was almost covering all the nickels they need so they were able to order less coin.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
255 Posts |
Nice Summary! I like seeing the numbers and comparing to mine. Have you found any good dated Buffalos? I'm working on putting together my overall CRH stats but here are my nickel averages: V nickel: 1 in 175,000 Buffalo: 1 in 9700 War Nickel: 1 in 2400 Low Mintage: 1 in 6900
|
|
Moderator
  United States
15446 Posts |
Wow ... I am thrilled with the interest and replies to this post! A few replies to the question and comments ... Quote: find many foreign coins? I do ... last updates on my foreign finds was at 200,000 nickels searched ... suppose I could do it again at 250,000 coins ... but I most likley will not find the time soon. You can read the 200,000 coin searched foreign find update here: https://goccf.com/t/69873Quote: nickelsearcher: what coins exactly do you keep from your searching. I'm almost embarrassed to admit that I have kept them all!  Yep ... all 3,273 finds ... I have given some away to forum member kids ... given some away to friends as starter kits ... but I have not (yet) returned a single pre-1960 nickel to the bank! I suppose you can call me a hoarder?  Quote: You should compile more info and write a book. Just a suggestion Appreciate the kind words  ... truth be told I am thrilled with the few replies on this topic that I get here at the CCF ... a book seems like a bit of a stretch in terms of numismatic interest. Perhaps if I get to 500,000 coins then a numismatic magazine article might be a possibility? Quote: yeash....I've been through a whopping two boxs and found over 80 cameo/deep cameo nickels and 6 war nickels You have indeed found the mother of all boxes!  I believe I commented as such in your thread ... so far ... at 250,000 coins searched ... I have found exactly 3 proof-only Jefferson. Quote: What is the best way to return them? Take them back to the bank with a smile on you face ... and an occasional donut or such for the tellers. Truly ... I have never had a problem with this ... just be honest in your intentions to roll search and friendly in your manner. Quote: Can you post the total of each coin that you found out of those 250,000 nickels? Uhhhhmmmm .. No.  Sorry ... way too much typing ... but how about this ... 5 Toughest ... 1943-D .... zero 1944-S .... 1 1939-D .... 1 1944-D .... 2 1942-S .... 2 5 Easiest ... 1958-D ... 236 1959-D ... 286 1957-D ... 200 1941 ..... 212 1946 ..... 181 Thanks to all for the interest in the topic and kindness of a reply. Best David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
NickelSearcher, Great data! I will present an update of my son's and my collecting in the format I used last time. Nickel #found (mintage in millions) Find Ratio GROUP 1 1950D 0 (2.6m) 0 1939D 3 (3.5m) .86 1938S 0 (4.1m) 0 1938D 2 (5.4m) .37 1939S 2 (6.6m) .3 GROUP 2 1951S 19 (7.8m) 2.44 1955P 14 (8.3m) 1.69 1949S 10 (9.7m) 1.03 1950P 14 (9.8m) 1.43 GROUP 3 1948S 13 (11.3m) 1.15 1946S 11 (13.6m) .81 1942D 9 (13.9m) .65 AND 1938P 15 (19.5) .77 As you recall, the find ratio is the number found per million minted. We only save the coins listed above, plus the silver, buffalo, and Liberty nickels. We have actually had an easier time finding the group 2 nickels (especially the 1951S) than the group 3 nickels even though the mintage is lower.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
David,
Don't sell yourself short - a book can easily be written with the data you've amassed. Your theory of obsolescence alone would be worth a couple of chapters.
And think of all the fun little anecdotes you can pepper throughout the book - like all the times DylansDad found a 43-D (which is one of the 3 I still need after 51 boxes). Although at one box a week, I still have a year and a half to go to catch up to you.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
For the last 3 months I've bought 5 rolls of nickels a month to sort through. I'm trying to fill out a couple of albums for fun - 1938 to date. No silver, a few 1938-9, and the run of the mill 1950's era are the highlights. Did get 3 silver quarters in change from a retail store earlier this year. They were mid-1940 dates. But it's all fun, anyway.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
15446 Posts |
 to the CCF sralloway! Pleased to have you here with us ... looking forward to any of your contributions. David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
I really wanted to collect for the fun of it but potentially provide investment as a strategy. I collected nickels because they are cheap to invest in. I have roll searched only about 15 boxes. The statistics shown in this thread has a good sample rate. I do also believe that location may have a effect on the numbers for example out of at least 15 boxes of Jefferson's I only found one from 2009. Number of collectors I believe that there may be one million coin collectors but I doubt they are full time jefferson collectors who will by an expensive nickel like the 1939-D. My interpretation of the numbers is what recently made me skip buying the 2009 rolls and went to 1955 BU for the same price yet significantly less mintage 7,888,000. Certainly from a short or long-term investment perspective the 2009 value is questionable. I made the mistake with the low mintage mistake with the 1968-S Lincoln pennies. What to collect Theoretically if you saved new MS60 (BU) coins in 1950 and were selling them to individuals today you could gain great profit for some of them. But hoarding common Jefferson's in circulation, even those that are pre 1960 are harder to justify. I remember one experienced collector saying he searched 100's of boxes and only had a handful of keepers. I don't agree but I am not at his level and don't have the money to buy the best. On a typical box I will save less than 2 rolls worth (and that's probably too much) 30 are pre 1955, 30 are selected dates and the other 30 are only MS60+FS coins Here's what I keep 1. Any Coin without significant damage prior to 1955 -- Keep. 2. Any Key Dates; War years 3. 1955-1970 selected coins of lower mintage, good strike/grade. 4. 1970-1980 dates, AU+ condition, 1971P good strike / grade. 5. 1980-1990 selected 82, 83, 84, 86 dates, Good strike / grade. Grade Grade is a significant factor and most coins I find from boxes are not MS60. There may be a better way than collecting coins by date; you should consider all the factors like rarity, mintage, grade and strike. I did not understand this before so many of my coins from earlier collecting where AU or less. Shiny nickels does not mean MS60. A question of Value Why are you collecting - for fun, potential future value, because you like to hoard? I don't want to be pessimistic But if you put 1 roll of nickels ($2.00) at a low 2% interest in the bank for 10 years you would have over $ 20.00. Certainly you should be highly selective of the coins you keep. I am now at the point where I seriously examine the potential overall value. Buying Jefferson's Would you rather have one 1958 MS60 coin or 7 average circulated 1958 Jefferson nickels? That's what it came down to for me. Coins can be expensive to buy and it's hard to make up the value, but there are some exceptions. I found a local store that sold some older 1946 to 1970's Jefferson's in MS60 for as low as .35. So I took my old rolls (when I didn't understand grade and strike) and went through them again and traded them in for less but better MS 60 coins...just a thought.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
927 Posts |
Coinmaster, You have a lot of very good points. I am sure that many of us are hoarders to some degree (myself included). I think it comes down to why you do it in the first place. I do it for enjoyment first. Future value is always secondary to me. But another reason I save them that you did not mention is that the metal value of nickels are now greater than face value. At some point in the future (who knows) they will stop making nickels and allow melting. Then they will all be worth more than 5 cents each.
The only thing I don't understand is the part about putting 1 roll in the bank at 2% interest for 10 years. According to my calculations, it comes to 2.44 if compounded at 2% for 10 years.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1745 Posts |
Quote:Circulation Estimates Based on Obsolescence: You know the math by now ... by using the original mintage totals for any coin and the circulation obsolescence data ... we can estimate the total number of surviving members of any coin in my database ... Just for fun ... as a way to illustrate the method ... consider that the entire Buffalo nickel mintage 1913 - 1938 was 1,212,899,041 coins. That is a fact. My obsolescence data says that 99.33% of them have been removed from circulation ... that is an estimate based on my 250,000 coin data ... this leaves what may appear to be a trivial 0.67% still around ... but that still represents a significant number of Buffalo nickels hanging out there waiting for us to find! Your model doesn't account for "replacement". When considering sampling theory, you need to consider whether an object gets returned to the population or not. I would venture a guess that the entire population of Nickels is not static (ie, just those minted and put into circulation), but also includes Nickels introduced back into circulation after many years of being out of circulation. That is how Liberty and Buffalo nickels are appearing in your sample. Trying to account for replacement or reintroduction back into circulation is a very impossible task. So all my blabbering is really just theory. With that being said, great job with the experiment and keep up the great work.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1028 Posts |
Those were very fascinating statistics. At least as far as the "rate of occurrence" I have kept similar data on my finds from 20 boxes. Not as big a sample size as yours, but large enough to count. There seems to be a good correlation between what I have realized and what you have realized, but the differences I do see would suggest that there are differences in geographical area. I live very close to San Francisco and all the S-minted nickels listed on your top 20, I was finding in much higher quantities. I also struggled with various lower mintage P nickels. I recall needing to get to my 6th box to find my first 1958-P. Lower mintage somewhat, but still ridiculous. I have completed a complete run minus 38S, 39DS, 43D, and 50D. You indicated that buffalos were more than 10 times as common as V nickels. I do think it's just a statistical anomaly that I have found twice as many V nickels as buffalos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1204 Posts |
Well done David ! I didnt count how many boxes I searched but my finds almost equal yours so I guess I searched about the same amount as you did and I wish I did a report since I started . My 38-67 folder is completed except for the 42d that is the only thing that make me keep asking at the bank for boxes of nickels ! I had more luck with v-nickels as I found a total of 11 but only 2 of them was from 1800's. I found about 20 buffalos but only 4 with date I started nickel roll search In january 2010 thats why I only found 1 of each key date , 38s,38d,39d,50d,39s,43D ; I found 3 or more of each semi key dates as 51s,55,etc I didnt have any problem in finding War Nickels as I just sold 100 to a coin shop , but allmight 43D I only found 1 and it was about month ago ! I wish you hade tracked your proof finds because I found a lot and I would like to know if is possible to make a full proof set from roll search ?!. I hope you dont get mad by my post , I just want to show my numbers in your post because I though we had basically very similar results duo we are almost in the same area as I live in the jersey side of the delaware bay ! What drive me crazy is the fact that I didnt find a single 42d ?! Sometimes I think if is possible every time if one 42d passed buy my hands during roll searching if my brain had identifyed as different date lol ! Again weldone and thank you for share the results of your hard work ! And btw the fact that I only found one of each key dates and you found doubles or triples of some of them tell us is because you started your search couple years before me what make think complete a set from search is race against time where everyday account as the coins somehow are been taking out of circulation ! After read your post again I saw you only found 3 proofs what is kind odd because I found a lot . I had boxes where I found 3 proofs , I found 2 on my last box ! I guess there is not many nickel searchers on my area thats why I found a nice amount of v-nickels and proof coins !
Edited by Ricardocody 09/23/2011 02:39 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
842 Posts |
 I was thinking....we all keep relatively detailed accounts of our finds. Would anyone entertain the thought of everyone putting their data together to create a massive, all-inclusive report like nickelsearcher did at the beginning of this thread? It would take some time on everyone's part but I think it would be fascinating. While nickelsearcher's data is overwhelmingly impressive, it could be even more accurate with input from us all. What say you? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
ancientcoinguy,
We all have different ways of keeping our statistics, and we all save different coins, so trying to combine statistics would be like comparing apples to oranges to pineapples to tangerines, etc. It would not be a bad idea, but we would not all be speaking the same language, so to speak.
|
| |
Replies: 31 / Views: 6,671 |