| Author |
Replies: 319 / Views: 63,912 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
Just to let you all know I have uploaded another batch of fake coins to my website. http://ukfakeanderrorcoins.50webs.com/(Now over 160 Fake Pound Coins and 33 Possibles) Including my latest find, this fake £2 coin...  Enjoy :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1324 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
837 Posts |
Thanks for the link , what a story !  Given their supposed sophistication I wonder if it will be possible to identify the fake pound coins from these Dutch forgers ... .  its amazing they had been in operation for that long
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
Quote: Dutch police are understood to have found machinery capable of producing the master dyes used to make £1 coins, something that has never been seen before in UK forgeries... industry sources said [the ECM] matched the sophistication of The Royal Mint.  This image taken from "Italian con artists caught with fake pound coins in Dover are jailed" http://www.kentnews.co.uk/news/ital...ed_1_3228684. Earlier coverage reported that these coins had been smuggled from Amsterdam. Only Bridge series coins appear in this image. There is one Bridge series that fits the bill perfectly. See user RED's gallery for Bridges coins that tick 3/4 boxes but are wrong weight. If I am recognizing these correctly, they are very slightly thinner than genuine, have distinct rounded cusps to the edges and a much grainier surface than a genuine £1 still of the same hue. Those, together with the Royal Mint-like fidelity of the faces, are diagnostic features. They often have errors particularly in the edge engraving as well as die cracks and Cuds, and are generally shinier (less oxidised) than usual for the years concerned, but any of the latter could occur in a genuine coin. Also the dots around the faces tend to hit the rim circle, which is thinner than normal because of the rounded cusps. I have only ever found them with Bridge designs, matching date and edge engraving, nothing else that seemed to be from the same source. This series may be mostly to blame for the resurgence in fake incidence between 2012 and 2013 surveys i.e. several million being imported in the meantime. However 30 million, even over several years, seems preposterously high if they also suspected in 2007 that the Enfield man then jailed made at least the blanks for 14 million, and considering what sort of numbers should be attributed to all the other large and medium scale series out there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
837 Posts |
That is a great analysis & explanation !  Its interesting what you said about the thin rims and their coins being shinier for their age because last year I got a 1990 pound coin which matched such a description ( and everything else about it seemed genuine) .... The link about the Italian fella busted with fakes no longer works,unfortunately  ; I will definitely check RED`s gallery  and look more closely for those fakes tommorow 
Edited by DaytR 03/23/2014 9:50 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
837 Posts |
Awesome !  I was shocked they got 10 months ,  could it be due to the small number of coins they had on them and passed ?
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
837 Posts |
Its funny you ask that because I first thought maybe it was one but on checking it didnt have the mirror like surface or the frosted like look which ruled out a proof ....
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-1-coin.htmlSpot the errors! (i) This £30m claim is going to run and run until someone like Marcus du Sautoy explodes it. (ii) Marcus Glindon jailed in 2007 was reported to have made 14 million blanks but not necessarily to have made all the finished coins from them. This contradicts the assertion attributed to Robert Matthews that the blank-makers have never been caught. (iii) The suggestion that forger Onel forced Osborne to change the £1 is a little ludicrous given that he was busted last December. (iv) Rather risqué to suggest that people stick suspected fakes into a machine to test for them! In any case there is at least one series of older fake £1 discussed in a journal paper as being undetectable except visually/optically. Somebody in a previous thread discussed having disposed of what appeared to be one of these in a machine. (v) The reverse design hasn't changed every year, there have been Royal Shield every year since 2008. Also changing the designs hasn't necessarily helped, e.g. it means more edge inscription fonts one has to become familiar with so as to recognize the better imitations.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
837 Posts |
Thanks for the link  , its an interesting article and  its very risqué to suggest that people stick suspected fakes into a machine to test for them after they had just stated what the law says..... The bits that I liked were : Quote:But The Royal Mint report noted that if a bank confiscated a suspect coin without compensation it could lead to a ‘public disturbance'.  .. but seriously, if they had offered to re-reimburse people for fakes found the number of really bad fakes would plummet to almost zero then banks and cash centers would be left free to filter out the harder to spot ones .....but having said that I found the numbers of fakes seized & those estimated to have been produced staggering  and this was also interesting to read => Quote: only those with a real eye for detail would ever know they were not real. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17994 Posts |
Got this one in change in the local pub yesterday - first fake I've had in quite a while:  
Edited by NumisRob 03/27/2014 04:12 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
837 Posts |
Well done Rob !  They are really getting hard to get and that one you got looks like it could pass a first glance especially were you got it 
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
252 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
52 Posts |
Ive been finding fakes left right and centre at work. Flicked through the till the other day and found 6!! I come across a few most shifts I've never properly looked until the last month or so but they are fairly common
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
188 Posts |
@ RED, looks like quite a rarity to have motto "N... SSIT" with those 'unsprung' S's. In fact any with such an S are getting rare these days. X83 in your gallery http://ukfakeanderrorcoins.50webs.com/ has it in the word 'DECUS'. I've also had it in the word 'DECUS' in one apparently from the same series as your B7, B9, X58, X87 and POSSS. These have grooves that criss-cross the reeding, a face texture that looks spray-painted, and generally a thick rim around the obverse, (resulting from) relatively angular cusps and a slightly larger diameter than real £1, though they are slightly thinner (thickness). Robert Matthews discussed an example here: http://www.coinauthentication.co.uk...ml#cftpounds but I presume this operation is long defunct, I've never found a bright, shiny one. Returning to the subject of the 'Dutch' operation, since the link I posted above to an image of Amsterdam-origin fakes appears broken, here is another go: 
|
| |
Replies: 319 / Views: 63,912 |