| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,760 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
I couldn't resist picking this 1893 nickel up.  |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1431 Posts |
Hard to say. Given that there's still quite a bit of rim definition left on the obverse, and considerably more reverse detail than the PCGS Photograde PO-1 example, I'm leaning towards FR-2
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
I don't think so. FR-2 details.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
I have one that has no reverse at all, and the obverse is almost totally gone, all you can see clearly is 1906. But yours is just above mine, so FR-2
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Looks Fair. I got one that would grade P-0.5. It is dateless and there is no reverse. PM me if interested.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
fair-details
it looks like there are several scratches on the obverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
I'm going with Fair Details.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
4227 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
567 Posts |
I would also say FR-2 details unfortunately.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15579 Posts |
Concur that this coin would receive a "Details- Damaged" grade as a result of the obverse scratches.
Technical grade would be FR02
David
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
1380 Posts |
Send it in to SGS, I'll bet you can get an MS-69 on it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
Quote:
Send it in to SGS, I'll bet you can get an MS-69 on it. True!   |
|
Moderator
United States
16681 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,760 |
|
Posted 11/13/2014 3:15 pm
