| Author |
Replies: 4,683 / Views: 272,562 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
1185 Posts |
excellent progress today and yesterday and the day before etc etc etc for > 500 consecutive days  I wonder: if CCF would have access to all collected dated coins in the world - what would be the year where this game would always end ?
|
|
Moderator
  United States
189767 Posts |
I will have to do some digging, but I think it has been discussed before in one of the previous editions. I am not sure if there was a consensus.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5179 Posts |
Quote: I wonder: if CCF would have access to all collected dated coins in the world - what would be the year where this game would always end ? Assuming that there are no date gaps in the Islamic - Arab-Sassanian - Sassanian proper lineage (I have no idea whether there actually are any), the first possibly missing date should be 495 AD. My search attempts gave inconclusive results on whether any coins are known from that year (or any other year in the first half of the 490s); the (fairly rare) dated Gupta coinage apparently covers much of the 5th century, but very spottily (it doesn't help that most dates are off flan). If it is possible to get across the 5th century (whether through the Guptas or otherwise), thanks to the Bosporans, the Western Kshatrapas, the Parthians, the Seleukids, and several other coin-dating places, there should be no gaps between ca. 380 AD and ca. 150 BC; I have no idea how far back we could go after that (my best guess is 3rd century BC). [EDIT: turns out that this is not true. My current best guess, assuming no 5th century gap, is 356 AD. There really appears to be no gap past 330 AD, however.] That said, it's perfectly possible that there is actually an unattested date in, say, the 11th century AD (when Islamic dated coins are apparently scarce). Quote: I prefer to only have two at the same time. New editions are started when the one edition reaches the same year as the other. The other is locked and a new one created. I never intended anything involving you going away from that tradition. I just propose that, if the date when the 5th edition reaches the same year as this one, and thus the 6th edition starts, ends up being in the second half of December 2019, said 6th edition should start with a coin dated 2020 (assuming, of course, that any such coins had already been issued by that time).
Edited by january1may 07/02/2018 8:33 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5179 Posts |
How far back can we go? We need -1482-
Someone should probably remind @Collects82 - it would be sad for them to miss their coins' day.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
189767 Posts |
Quote: I just propose that, if the date when the 5th edition reaches the same year as this one, and thus the 6th edition starts, ends up being in the second half of December 2019, said 6th edition should start with a coin dated 2020 (assuming, of course, that any such coins had already been issued by that time). Makes sense to me. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
@january1may Thanks for the heads up! Would love to post one  1/2 Schwertgroschen Sachsen-Markgrafschaft Meißen (State: Saxony, Principality: Margraviate of Meissen)  1-1/2 Falus Gujarat Sultanate - Mahmud Shah I, AH 887 = 1482 
Edited by Collects82 07/03/2018 4:25 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
189767 Posts |
Quote: @january1may Thanks for the heads up! Would love to post one Excellent! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34442 Posts |
You posted a real beaut there @collects82. When are we going to change you to @collects82and81? I'd love to have some help tomorrow with 1481.  Here is a Half Schwertgroschen from the German City State of Saxony dated (14)82 AD. It is attributed as Levinson I 185 and Saurma 4400. The flan crack is a wicked bummer. Also, I apologize for the poorly-colored pics. This coin is actually silver despite the pictures seeming to show it as bronze or gold.  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34442 Posts |
Quote: excellent progress today and yesterday and the day before etc etc etc for > 500 consecutive days Sorry for not including this in my prior post, but I want to specifically and separately call out @pepactonius for his (her?) amazing dedication to these OFEY threads. @jbuck is a capable adminstrator and wonderful cheerleader, but it is @pepactonius who leads the way with a new post at 12:01 am EST *every* single day. 
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
  United States
189767 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
Speaking of 4th/5th centuries from yesterday's posts, 382 and 482 are proving to VERY allusive. There might be rare late Roman gold issues, but I've never seen anything copper / silver. Any tips where I might want to look, other kingdoms have something?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
1185 Posts |
Quote: a new post at 12:01 am EST *every* single day @pepactonius has given this thread with a solid backbone  but @spence added some flesh to the backbone on a very regular basis 
Edited by 1c5d7n5m 07/03/2018 6:30 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5179 Posts |
Quote: Speaking of 4th/5th centuries from yesterday's posts, 382 and 482 are proving to VERY allusive. There might be rare late Roman gold issues, but I've never seen anything copper / silver. Any tips where I might want to look, other kingdoms have something? Western Kshatrapas have 382 in silver, good luck finding one, but they definitely exist. I'm not sure whether 482 even exists. Sassanian dates have a several-decade gap at that point. Bosporans stopped dating their coins long before; Byzantines didn't start until much later. Gupta dates might include it, but few Gupta coins have dates at all, and I couldn't find anything remotely systematic on dated Gupta coins online that wasn't either "here's two or three random examples" or written in the 19th century. (For the record, no, the dates as catalogued in the 19th century references I found did not include 482, but I thought that maybe an example was found later.)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34442 Posts |
Here is a Double Briquet from the Netherlands Duchy of Brabant (Antwerp mint). It is dated 1481 AD and attributed as Levinson II 54. At this point, I have yet another break in my OFEY collection so I'm hoping that someone else out there has a 1480-dated coin to keep us moving.   
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
1185 Posts |
the 1481 double briquet from Antwerp is splendid ! extrememy clear date  and a nice human hand between the lions; we discussed this mint mark about 100 days ago in this thread
|
| |
Replies: 4,683 / Views: 272,562 |