| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 2,468 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
Just wanted to get an idea on this 1953 S Nickel. It looks beautiful, except the wear on the building and steps on the back. If only it had the steps. It looks great everywhere else though. What do you think?   |
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Very nice uncirculated LDS . what's going on in Obverse fields ? MS-64 .  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19281 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
171 Posts |
Thanks! I think its just the lighting/picture angle I took. The fields look pretty clean for a 68 year old coin. Got it out of a coin roll from the bank.   Edited by OriginalAtog
06/11/2021 07:39 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 . It is folder worthy. John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say MS-63. to the CCF! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18740 Posts |
even with the weak strike I can see it at MS63 or 64. there is only a few dollars difference between 63 and 64 so it really doesn't matter much
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
To the Forum. Nice coin! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
what at first looks like wear on the reverse is merely a weak strike, something common during the mid-1950s, MS-64, nice find
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
Typical 1953 S strike (without steps)
I'd say MS64
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
Thanks! Definitely going to put it in a holder and keep it :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,468 |
|
Posted 06/11/2021 07:35 am
