Maybe I am confused (and old) but how does a strike through anything happen before the strike , in this case the shaving would be on the planchet before the strike , and the gouge would be created during the strike ,not before
To me still, it is post mint. If there were little slivers or danglers at the end of the gouge, the strike would have plastered them into the field. I still say post mint.
No Bill, it is not. It is a strike-through error. Struck through a bronze filament, which is partially retained (these tend not to bond).
I can bring a few examples with me at the next coin show we are all together.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer
You're right oldmike, I made no sense. I guess I got sidetracked with okie's comment about a scratch causing the extra metal and only looked at that. I've asked that my two dumb posts be deleted. Of course a piece of metal from swomewhere else caused the mark.
So the two pieces that were confusing me were a retained part of the struck through then? I have no experience with metal work, I would have though copper wire would have essentially fused with the coin as well but the rest makes sense and it most definitely has the appearance of a stuck through even with the photos provided.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use