| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,851 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I believe the coin might be FB, but not sure on the grade based on the pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
Seeing blotch spots, I think is MS-64 but lacking FB, unless is the photo.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
209 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think they gave it a MS-65. Nice coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Full bands for me gets it to about the MS-65 grade. UNLESS those marks on the obverse are on the face.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
132 Posts |
ms64 gorgeous coin though!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
65 and I bet NGC gave it FB.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
421 Posts |
I would say ms-65, and looks like fb designation to me.
woohoo post 100 for me!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
1942-D is a well-struck date generally, so they're not going to give as much slack on the FB designation that they might give to a tougher date like 1945.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
I guess that NGC will say MS65FB
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I'll say MS-64, But hoping you get MS-65. Difficult to judge to see if FB from the pic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1150 Posts |
From those photos I'll say MS65FSB.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3345 Posts |
Here ya go fellas. I woulda said 64 as well, what with all the splotches on it.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Well, there you go. Close to FB, but no cigar. There is no destination for "close FB", lol.  Thanks for sharing, rachums107 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
This is where the graders gets tire of looking at similar coins from batches of common dates Mercury dimes in similar grades, unless its proof like shine or the strike is ultra sharp and spotless, the brain starts to repeat its counting pattern. This is MS-65...This is MS-64...This is MS-65...This is MS-64... |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,851 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/14/2011 7:20 pm
