| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,860 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
597 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2424 Posts |
wheat ears on the left look smudged a bit, maybe its lighting...but the beard has great detail! i would say MS62RB
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
558 Posts |
Spot on guesses. Here's the slab.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
Nice coin. Looks beautiful
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
No surprizes here, accurate grade from NGC.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
Can I ask a question that I don't know if its silly or not... But like SD said, the left ear appears a little smudged, assuming it is in person how it appears in the photo, if this coin had the smudge and instead of being BN, lets say it were RD... Do you think the numberical grade would drop down to lets say a 60 or even an AU? Just curious for my own knowledge.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
558 Posts |
Here's an alternate photo of the reverse that, although dark, shows the wheat ear detail better.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
Oh wow! Looks totally different!! I think you should send it to me to inspect HAHA! Beautiful coin!!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
That's a harsh grade seeing the new photos. I bet someone sent that in gambling on a 65BN and were quite upset over it coming back 63. I hate when they purely grade on the surfaces and luster. That coin is well-struck and hardly has a hit on it. It should be a lock for 64BN if it looks like that bottom picture in hand.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,860 |
Page 2 of 2
|