| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 1,790 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I agree that it may be a PL but I am just not quite sure if both sides are PL. I guess it could grade either MS-65 or 66 and possibly PL as well. I am eager to see the results as it is a beautiful coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
933 Posts |
just seeing if this one shows up larger. you guys are right the obverse is PL and the reverse is close  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
this is as large as I can keep them because the image optimizer shrinks them, the images are off my ipad, is there anyway to downsize the file size before I send it from there   |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
Who do you guys recommend I send it to to be graded?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
I'm thinking MS65 and maybe prooflike. She's a beaut! Send to NGC.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'm going to agree with 1893S and call it 65, with a shot at 66 because the fields are so nice. NGC would probably call it 65* because the obverse certainly looks PL to me.
Keep in mind, though, with this issue that grade still leaves you with a coin worth less than $200. They come easy in high grades. NGC and PCGS together have slabbed over 25,000 higher than MS65, which is ridiculous even if you factor resubmissions. Those aren't likely since it's about the cheapest MS66 Morgan you can buy.
As regards the image sizer, drop Bobby an email or post a thread in the Support forum asking for the free Gallery that CCF members of your seniority are eligible for. This will greatly ease your image limitations, and it seems worth it because your iPad, in typical Apple fashion, sure looks to have one heck of a mobile camera.
Crop your images as close to the coin as you can, 800px square or the largest you can do, and save them at slightly-reduced quality. 300-400kb isn't unrealistic.
Edited to add: Just noticed you were in need of editing assistance. I'm not an Apple guy and can't help; hopefully someone else can offer a decent iPad image editor.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
Thanks for the help SsuperDdave, ya the iPad has a pretty amazing camera on it, but the images are almost 2mb lol!
So the pictures do take quite a hit on quality and size.
I am just waiting on a few other coins I have purchased and then off they will go to get graded so will probably be about a month.
Cheers and have a great rest of your holidays
Kris
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
I'd call MS-65, I've had quite a few 66's and a couple 67's over the years, while not rare, this one IMO falls shy of 66 territory. Just too many tiny ticks around the neck/jaw line area. I don't think it would make PL either.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
CCF Sponsor
United States
702 Posts |
I'm calling it 65, obverse on the way to pl! Lovely coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
Wow, she's a real looker!
Edited by oih82w8
11/27/2012 10:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
Kman did you get one of those macro lenses for your iPad ?
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
No, it's just straight up got this one a year ago, why should I?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
I was just curious. I doubt I can get a pic like that with mine. I thought that you must have the macro lens you can buy for them. I was just looking at them on ebay. Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
from the updated pictures my first thought looks to be correct, the Obverse looks PL but I think the Reverse falls short. I agree with the MS-65 grade on this one also and NGC may give it a star because of the Obverse PL fields as SsuperDave said which would make it a little more valuable than a regular MS-65 from PCGS, that is if they give it the star. So if it were mine and I was going to submit it this is one of those rare cases that I would pick NGC over PCGS in hopes of receiving the star
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,790 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/23/2012 08:45 am
