| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,256 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
From the above photos, I would place a grade of MS-61 or 62.
1941 is one of the common year and has one of the higher mintage count, there has to be lots of luster on both side in order to qualify for MS-64. Unless is missing from the way the pictures are taking.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
Edited by thecoincollector333 10/11/2013 7:12 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
It's a really nice dime, but I am thinking 63. One or two tiny black spots hold it back a bit. Very light sctatch near 'L' (obv), and another under 'R' (rev).
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
Does it have white luster? Also did anybody see the PCGS MS-69 Mercury dime on photograde, it looks worse than the MS-61 coin LOL
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
No matter what the grade is was it a good deal for 5 bucks?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18689 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
Could you tell me why you think it's that grade please,
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36841 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
WHY is it MS-61 or 60? Is it because of the detail,scratches,toning,that little black dot. Please explain.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts |
I think some people are grading it on eye appeal rather than on the technical merits. Consider this; generally an MS63 is your average MS coin. It has some bag marks, maybe one decent hit in a non focal area. This coin is better than that. There are a couple of hits on the obverse that stand out to me, but really nothing that is so distracting that it would grade at the 63 level. I tend to overlook color when grading from a photograph. I would be comfortable with a grade of MS64. I am not one of those that grades different years of the same series by different standards. Just my Two Cents.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
I would say eye appeal is important, you can have a MS-66 coin that has distracting marks or bad uneven tone, and a MS-64 that has nice even wear or tone with good luster. The graders have different opinions, even the pros can have a off day, if you send it to different TPG it can come back with different grade, can be a point or even two points off. Chances of being two points off is very slim.
|
|
New Member
 United States
28 Posts |
But would the toning/marks make the coin a worse grade, or keep it form being a higher grade?
I just don't get what the toning or marks has to do with the grade.
If you're saying that the toning/marks makes the coin a lower grade than the details, isn't that a NET grade?
Edited by thecoincollector333 10/12/2013 4:21 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,256 |
Page 2 of 2
|