| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,910 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
EF-45 (appears to be a little weakly struck)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
919 Posts |
Quote: EF-45 (appears to be a little weakly struck) I agree. It had two things going against it. It was struck in San Fran and they were using different planchets back then.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
54 Posts |
Nice coin. This is not my series so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I would say 40 due to lack of luster.
As I understand it the 18-S is an elusive strike. It also happens to be the date of the only walker I currently own.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
919 Posts |
Thanks. I bought it as a AU53 grade and am pretty comfortable with that. In hand it is a great looking s mint. It will be fun to see how PCGS grades the week strike and early Walker. Again it was nice to see no details grade. I usually pull at least one of those.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
286 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
286 Posts |
Would love to see what it's grade is.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
919 Posts |
As an example here is an AU53 1918.  And an EF45 1918 to compare to. 
Edited by tpg22 10/13/2013 08:25 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
There is quite a range between the grades of the two examples that in my opinion may only vary slightly by strike quality. It seems that having early Walkers graded is like a box of chocolates. I'm interested to see what PCGS has to say about yours.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
919 Posts |
I will post either way (me happy at AU50's or me sad at EF45's). I want us all to learn the grading of the early Walkers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6388 Posts |
Here's my 1917-S OMM graded XF-45 by PCGS. This coin was previously graded AU-50 by SEGS. It has quite a bit of remaining luster and pretty strong feather detail which makes me think SEGS was closer to the mark. I agree that grading the early Walkers seems tricky and pretty subjective.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
919 Posts |
Thanks for posting that Jaobler. I agree it appears AU50. The only thing that might affect the grade is 1917S obverse coins are known for strong strikes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
919 Posts |
I spent a few hours looking at WLH's in the EF40-AU55 range for sale on ebay and many other sites. I guess it comes down to the grader and their decision whether a coin is worn or struck poorly. When it comes to the early Walkers that is very subjective. I saw coins with breast feathers worn flat get AU53 grades and coins with midbreast feathers get EF45. I'm sending 12 WLH's in today with 8 Peace dollars. It should be interesting in a month when I get them back. Then I will send another batch of WLH's and SLQ's.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,910 |
Page 2 of 2
|