| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,099 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
A Beauty!   65? Edited by Night-Hawk
11/03/2013 02:55 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
I'm waivering between 64 and 65, but I'll lean toward MS65.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
65 seems right. Yeah, I like this design also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
919 Posts |
I'm going to say MS64. Hard to tell from the photos but there looks like some spotting on the OBV by the I in Liberty and some marks in the right field. Also some pretty good hits to the skirt above the date and on her arm. The two cracks to the left of the date are interesting. I have not seen those before.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Nice looking coin.
Well struck for one from the early 40's.
I don't see any luster breaks so I'll go with UNC.
I also don't see any distracting marks; I'd say MS-65 with an outside shot at a -66.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36901 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
339 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
strong stike, unbroken luster, no wonder you like it. MS65 could go 66 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1890 Posts |
Pretty coin, well photographed. Has to be an MS piece.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
How is this not AT LEST a 65? I'm a solid 66.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
65+ FULL fingers. Obverse has a couple chatter marks (cheek, left hip, arm, breat).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think it may just pull out a MS-66.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 1751 Posts |
Decided against sending this one in.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
416 Posts |
also one of my favorite designs, great luster but a few to many marks to grade over 64+
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,099 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/03/2013 07:57 am
