| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 1,996 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
By the way, I think it's a 10-D and not a 10-S.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
4849 Posts |
nope its an S. It was previously NGC certified.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
Wow... That "S" sure looks like a "D"!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
 , it's no doubt a D from these pictures. I think NGC may have made another one of their label mistakes that I've been seeing more of lately. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
The more I look at it, the more I'm convinced it's a "D".
NGC made a labeling typo. It happens.
If it's still in the holder send it back to them and have them correct it. If it's no longer in the holder then ***oops!***.
Did you pay for an 'S' or 'D'? I'm afraid to look and see what the pricing differences are between the two.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
A 1910-S is TRIPLE the price in MS-60+ than the 1910-D.
Edit: not good, not good, NOT good!
Edited by Cruisinfusion
07/17/2014 7:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
931 Posts |
I agree with low AU. The chopped up cheek is pretty bad. Plus the little cotton ball thingies on his headress are pretty worn. Upper wing feathers worn. I love those coins, and I have a batch of them NGC graded. Somehow I bought them all raw, and none of them were fake. That was my proudest numismatic moment, considering how many fakes there are. COULD BE AN S.
Edited by junior e
07/17/2014 8:09 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I will try to take some pictures....but I have been collecting these a long time. sigh....this is DEFINITELY an S. I have an AU 1910-D right next to it in my album, very different construct in the shape of the mintmark. The S is smooshed for sure on this coin, but there is no doubt in my mind that it is an S....I can make out the upper and lower serifs in hand. NGC did not make a mistake or typo.
Edited by johnny54321
07/17/2014 11:29 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
First is an up close picture of the mintmark on the 1910-s coin discussed on this thread. It is smooshed for sure, but you can make out the serifs.  Second is a closeup of my 1910-D mint mark. Notice the half moon shape. Its a completely different shape, even if the serifs were so smooshed that you could not make out the dividing lines, you could still distinguish between the two.  I apologize my top pics weren't the greatest. My wife had the camera for the evening, so I gave things a whirl with my iphone....which doesn't do too bad, but not up to snuff with our real camera. Anyways, I will leave the floor open for more grading guesses, but hopefully this settles the D vs. S dispute. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
ok..... the 2nd pic looks like an "S".
I'll still stick with low end AU on the grade ---- AU50/53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
NGC graded this one AU-58. Regardless of the marks, there is a lot of luster remaining, which is probably why they graded it the way they did.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
I had no idea what this one graded. It looked like a D to me but seeing your close ups on the mint mark it's an S.
As these wear, it seems the mint marks turn mushy.
-MV
|
|
Valued Member
United States
450 Posts |
Glad it's an S John, I was scared for ya there !
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,996 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/17/2014 4:31 pm
