| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,465 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
I'm guessing they graded her MS-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
Because you said that it's one of your newer favorites regardless of what PCGS thinks, I'd say they gave it a UNC details-artificial toning.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
What'd they do, use the sniffing dogs? It looks like old toning that one would expect from an old Paramount holder or something. Hard to grade the obverse with all that tone, but I'll guess they called it AU55 because of the bag rub.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 968 Posts |
All over the place with the grades thus far, this is fun.
2 details grades
AU55
MS63
MS64
MS65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
919 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
It is a beautiful morgan.
The way you introduce this coin keeps me guessing. I like that.
I see an AU55 (or AU-64) with wild toning.
Edited by noD
08/07/2014 7:51 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think PCGS gave it a MS-64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
My grade: MS-64
PCGS grade: no idea
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I'd guess either AU58 or Altered Surfaces.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
Appears to be some wear... But of course it may have been a slider and made MS.
MS-details is my guess.
|
|
New Member
United States
26 Posts |
Whatever the grade that coin is gorgeous. Not experienced enough to render a grade but I'm amazed what can naturally occur over 100+ years.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
968 Posts |
So I bought this coin raw and submitted it myself... I was thinking MS64. PCGS agreed, and CAC also agreed.  I knew that statement in the beginning would throw some of you off.  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
It certainly threw me off. I read into it that you were not in agreement with PCGS, hence my guess of AU55. I think it really deserves what is on the label.  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,465 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/07/2014 6:19 pm
