| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,263 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
Oooph! I am going to bump to 66+ or...might I say...67?!
Is that a mark in the field, just under the arrowheads? I see a couple ticks on the edges of the rim...but overall, ...nice one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
66 is definitely not out of the realm of possibilities, but I think the mark on the eagle and near the rim on the obverse/reverse is going to hold it from being a 67. I'll stick with 66 I think.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
10625 Posts |
Quote: Is that a mark in the field, just under the arrowheads It is. That's the only real hit on the coin. Beyond that there's only a few little tics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Puerto Rico
778 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Quote: The luster is much better than my photos indicate. I'm thinking this one has a good shot at a 67. It's a really nice coin. I'm curious what the Accugrade is.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
933 Posts |
I would like to say 67 as well but am going in at 65 because looking really close there are a few deep marks on the reverse and plus the black spots and whatever is going on around the eagles right wing reminds me of a previous dip
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
That is one of the cleanest cheeks I've seen in a long, long time. The carbon spots on the reverse are a distraction.
I wouldn't be surprised if "Accugrade" slabbed it 68!
Real world grade today would be 65 to 66.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Tough to say from the photo - if the luster is booming might make 67 but from the photo best I can say is 65 or better
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Oh wow... that's really nice and mark-free. Probably a 65 but also easily a 66.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
MS 66. Lots of carbon marks distract from the luster. I think this is worth getting graded by NGC or PCGS.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
10625 Posts |
Here's what ACG (Accugrade) gave it. The fields are much more reflective than the photos show, but I don't think it's technically PL. I've got I think 6 Morgans in these old Accugrade holders and they're actually really close to reality. Thanks for all the replies. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
That's beautiful 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,263 |
Page 2 of 2
|