| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,239 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
830 Posts |
XF45 Maybe cleaned with those pictures.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36845 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Possibly dipped to remove toning but that's been on my mind recently and I could be just seeing things
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
675 Posts |
AU-50, unsure on a light cleaning/dipping.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Wow, you guys are harsh.  And letting a weak hair and cap distract you from the completeness of the talons and neck on the reverse. This is a classic example of the conundrum of only one side of a coin wearing. Since that is intuitively not possible, you have to think harder. If the reverse is AU55, how did the obverse wear to XF? It didn't, that's how. This one is no worse than AU50, possibly 53. I don't believe the surfaces original, though. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1152 Posts |
If submitted do you guys think this coin would come back "cleaned"?
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
Not positive from these pics but yes, I think they would default to "if there's a chance, we Details it."
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
I would say AU50 does look possibly dipped/cleaned
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18702 Posts |
AU53 maybe 55. The washed out surfaces may indicate a dipping
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,239 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/04/2015 09:48 am
