| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,416 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
500 Posts |
1981 - yes
1979 - no
Are you 100% certain you have an 81 type 2?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
I would like to see this 81 s type 2 I can tell you really quick if it's a type 2 with a clear picture of mintmark. $8 is unbelievable. But if it for real then you scored. Let's see some pics :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3077 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
To me, that looks like the 1979 Variety 2 which is the same at the 1981 Variety 1.
I moved this thread to the Variety and Error sub-forum for the proper attention.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
Well I have compared it to my 79s and other 81s .
And with photos of the type 2 on small dollars . Com and it looks like the type 2
|
|
Moderator
United States
190135 Posts |
Which is why I moved it here, for more qualified opinions.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Here's a basic comparison chart that might help.  It does get quite confusing at first when attempting to discern between the '79 and '81 Type 1 and 2's at the same time! Hope this helps! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
So JDRMCB which type do you think it is?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
Not a good picture but that is a type 1. The bottom seriff clearly shows it . Literally a type 2 looks like it was flattened. If you go on ebay and look at PCGS graded coins and find a couple picture with close ups you will see the difference. I say graded so you know they are legitimate. That looks like a type one from your picture. |
|
Moderator
United States
190135 Posts |
To me it is the "fields always clear inside loops" of the variety 2. Look at the top loop of the mint mark in that photo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
I concur.  It's a Type 1...unless it was a '79,  then it would be a Type 2.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1781 Posts |
One of the main things to remember on these (the 1981-S) is that the fields are NOT always clear on the Ty-2. It's in the shape not the clarity of the inside of the loops. I've found lots of Ty-2 with MMs that were punched in deep eliminating the clarity and purchased them for the regular price and got them certified and sold. You'll have a huge advantage over others if you can lean this in addition to the differences in the shape.
Edited by koinpro
11/24/2015 8:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1781 Posts |
BTW, the other illustrative document on this post is incorrect. Those are both Ty-2. Check this one out. Used to be a hand-out that Numismatic News passed out at shows in the 1980s. I still have a small handful of them. And remember, clarity of the Mintmark has nothing at all to do with which variety it is. Look for the differences in the shapes of the loops, etc.  |
|
Moderator
United States
190135 Posts |
Even using your documentation, I still think yotie has a 1981-S variety 1 (or 1979-S variety 2, since the date is not visible).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is a side by sie of the mint marks.  Always nice to see them that way and see the differences. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,416 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/22/2015 8:36 pm
