| Author |
Replies: 38 / Views: 8,205 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
New collector here. I've read Coin World, Numismatic News, Coinage, coin Prices, etc. Where do you find Coin Week? Shouldn't this info be published in CW and NN?
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
Now if the point comes where they say not my problem the market will drastically change.
OR if they stop grading "problem" coins like the corroded coin that got past one of the services.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: OR if they stop grading "problem" coins like the corroded coin that got past one of the services That certainly would change the market as well. Those types of coins are a way for a lot of people to get dates or a level of detail they couldn't otherwise afford. To me as long as they stand behind what they do and make any mistakes right buying them back which it sounds like they are, they market shouldn't be affected much if at all.
|
|
Valued Member
59 Posts |
Dear Drew,Being an expert when it comes to counterfeit coins...I am VERY INTERESTED in finding out your qualifications. There might be some folks on this sight who actually are professionals such as J.P.Martin.
Perhaps for now, we should all calm down and let the evidence come in after the TPGS review the actual coins AGAIN. For example: Looks like the 1798 1c coins are Counterfeit and slipped past the TPGS.
It is extremely hard to detect THESE State-of-the-art fakes in hand. We have less of a chance trying it with photos. I applaud those guys who were able to match the contact marks on the large cent. Their work has been confirmed.
The TPGS guarantee their opinion so in the long run, no one will be hurt. In the old days, Secret Service would be notified about these sellers and they would be visited. SS has bigger fish to fry now.
One more thought. When ANACS was established as the first authentication service, the people who worked there knew that every opinion they rendered would be "checked" by a million eyes. Those "eyes" are still out there as proven by this thread!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4469 Posts |
Update the seller "kiki2010hy" had changed the ebay user ID to "happycoins2010" and happycoins2010 currently has no coins listed on ebay.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Sounds like a name a person of Chinese culture would have. Implies good fortune.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1757 Posts |
In my new book coming out in November 2016 I have a chapter on Chinese Counterfeit Modern Coins and their die transfer methods and detection. I have analyzed over 100 Chinese coins from the die transfer process and examined their alloys. They are typically Fe/Ni, German Silver (Cu/Zn/Ni) and debased silver alloys. HOWEVER - once they are in a PCGS/NGC/ANACS holder - GAME OVER - as hand held and XRF bench top devices can't extrapolate out the plastic interference's of the coin being in the holder. However = In person these die transfer process are easy to spot IMO due to raised metal like air bubbles, their general off-appearance and/or raised small metal spots on the surface due to air bubbles and the difficulty of duplicating the AGE FACTOR of the third side. As most of you know I am an expert in contemporary circulating counterfeits (i.e., genuine period counterfeits) and have collections in over ten U.S./Foreign series - but once in a TPG holder and buying on the Internet - its difficult if the coin mimics the coin in the TPG database. At this point not even John Lorenzo and his Material Devices can help ... IMO. It seems the only time you can SPOT IT ... is when its TOO LATE ... when the coin is IN HAND. As we all know there are no regulations to stop this at the SOURCE (i.e., in China). John Lorenzo Numismatist United States
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
happycoins2010 just went into my followed sellers list as well as my blocked bidders.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
This is an issue that I will guarantee you a majority of dealers won't be aware of. However, once aware of the problem, an experienced shop owner should be able to tell a counterfeit coin in a genuine slab when in hand, surely?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
Quote: Quote: Being an expert when it comes to counterfeit coins, these all look perfectly fine to me. I ask this as well, how many 17 year old coin experts do you know?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
Quote: In my new book coming out in November 2016 I have a chapter on Chinese Counterfeit Modern Coins and their die transfer methods and detection. I have analyzed over 100 Chinese coins from the die transfer process and examined their alloys. They are typically Fe/Ni, German Silver (Cu/Zn/Ni) and debased silver alloys. HOWEVER - once they are in a PCGS/NGC/ANACS holder - GAME OVER - as hand held and XRF bench top devices can't extrapolate out the plastic interference's of the coin being in the holder. I'd argue it's game over before it is even slabbed. It is quite possible the copper coins in particular are being struck over worn down original and genuine large cents / Half Cents. If you can't identify it being fake from the strike characteristics, it isn't going to matter if you have XRF or any other technology.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
Hey, let me state... I am not trying to bash Drew, I think he is a super nice kid, and is really learning to tell the good from the bad and I am sure he is a brilliant kid as well. (I say 'kid' because I have two kids older then him). I also think he will make an excellent grader and become a real pro as time passes.
So, Drew, if you read this. Please keep submitting your posts and ideas on the legitimacy of coins. However, I would caution on calling yourself an 'expert' just yet. An 'expert' is someone who knows everything about a subject. I have never met anyone who really knew 'everything' about a subject.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
127 Posts |
I reported this on Facebook earlier this month.
A friend of mine (and coin dealer) bought a nice 1879 CC dollar in a PCGS slab, grade MS-64 with a CAC sticker, at a local CA coin show. Upon further examination when he returned home, the coin should have graded 61 at most. Further examination revealed a fake CAC designation on a fake holder. The holder had no PCGS logo on the lower right. He returned the coin for a full refund. He didn't crack the holder, so the coin could have been counterfeited also. Anybody else know of this problem ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4469 Posts |
Fake holders and fake coins are on the market, this is the first that I have heard about with a fake CAC sticker.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
324 Posts |
My theory is the big graders NGC, PCGS can't keep up with the demand and short grading times. So, they hire more and inexperienced people or provide short training times or people may have never been collectors to begin with. Mistakes are easy to make when you have hard demands to turn around fast on the grading. I remember a senior grader and executive at ICG 15 years ago telling me this could happen when the demand is in overload status.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 38 / Views: 8,205 |
Page 3 of 3
|