| Author |
 Replies: 24 / Views: 2,252 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
42 Posts |
AU-58........possibly altered as the right arm and hand look weird.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1789 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
Quote:
possibly altered as the right arm and hand look weird. No, they all look like that, the darker toning colors in the details might make it look a bit odd, but the details are normal. Edited by EFLargeCents
02/08/2016 6:19 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
AU53 to me.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18836 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 so what did it grade? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6426 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Germany
1856 Posts |
Many many thanks for your opinions - I had forgotten what ANCS had graded this coin. Thinking it was graded AU53, I was happy to read most of your opinions were in line. I was therefore a bit surprised when I pulled it out of the box and saw the actual ANACS grade was EF45.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18836 Posts |
I can see it as low as AU50 but not XF45. way too much detail for XF
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36916 Posts |
I agree, they were pretty hard on this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
I'm thinking AU-53, maybe 55 if the luster is there. Should easily upgrade in my non-expert opinion.
Not one of the really old ANACS holders since it has a 19 unit barcode.
Edited by Joe2007
02/10/2016 12:20 am
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,252 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/08/2016 2:38 pm
