| Author |
Replies: 83 / Views: 8,479 |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2019 Posts |
Quote:The biggest difference between The Royal Mint and RCM is they have their spokesperson and their website clearly announcing their position on these coins, the ads on the 20 for 20 to most buyers is clear the RCM is guaranteeing face value, it doesn't say thirty day manufacturing defects only sounds just like Sears or Eatons slogan for years before they almost went bankrupt, Yes yes, most of us if not all know what the RCMs stance is on their "coins" at the moment. The Royal Mint had the same policies but now has changed them. This what some of us are trying to say. They "could" change their polices, I am not saying they are going to, who knows. But if one major Mint starts doing this others "could" follow. "The 'face value' and 'legal tender' coins that you can't cash in: Has Royal Mint been mis-leading special coin buyers?" Quote:Royal Mint tells banks to stop cashing in special 'face value' coins Website now clarifies narrow definition of 'legal tender' Readers hit out, claiming they feel duped by commemorative coins Royal Mint says those wanting to sell coins must go to collectors £100 silver coin is made with roughly £19 worth of precious metal http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/...-buyers.html
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Northerncoins, you've expressed your thoughts very well. That's exactly my point too. Just because something is the way it is now, don't assume it won't change in the future! Many XforX collectors bought them as collector coin and for the right reasons, but for others who might be saving towards their children's education or another longterm reason, nowhere has RCM ever given the guarantee they're redeemable at face value forever. Furthermore it really ticks me off that RCM uses marketing tactics such as they do - not unethical but it's easy for new collectors to jump to incorrect conclusions....and they do a very poor job of offering any educational component. Instead the focus is on buy, buy, buy! For example they advertise a $20 for $20 is 99.9999% silver which may lead some people to conclude the coin is made from $20 worth of silver. Instead, after one does the math, they'd discover it contains only 1/4oz worth of silver, less than $5 worth at today's spot price. A very poor option in terms of a silver investment as well, at a price of x4.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
Not sure how or care how The Royal Mint marketed these coins but we are sure how the RCM is currently marketing these coins, if they followed the British example, it's false and misleading advertisement or in the worst case fraud. The RCM could follow suit and announce from this date on new version will be useless trinkets but they will destroy their NCLT business, these coins must attract enough new customers to the RCM or they would have cancelled them already.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Quote:
......but they will destroy their NCLT business....
How so? Adding: From a business perspective, we don't have any information to consider since RCMs financial statements do not specially reveal the volume of XforX it redeems and no mention of counterfeiting ever. But RCMs redemption of $5 worth of silver at a cost of $20, adding in melt and production costs in order to remint the bullion into some current edition of NCLT certainly erases any profit it originally incurred on the sale of that $20. So it's possible it will come a time when XforX's become unprofitable and we likely will not know if or when it's "destroying their business". But it's quite possible that time already occurred in the UK and that's partly the reason the legislation to define "legal tender" was amended.
Edited by wildflowerAB 04/07/2016 2:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
If you offer a product guarantee and about face, why would you trust the company with future purchases, they will become no better than a Franklin mint. The Perth Mint restruck some bullion coins and are still suffering from that decision. These 20 for 20 never made any profit for the RCM, with handling shipping and with royalty on the superman series, they must lose a wack on each coin but it must do a service of bringing new collectors. The Royal Mint could have sold these coins at the get go without any assurance unlike the RCM
Edited by john100 04/07/2016 2:38 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
"In this world nothing can be said to be certain (guaranteed), except death and taxes." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2019 Posts |
Quote:If you offer a product guarantee and about face, why would you trust the company with future purchases, they will become no better than a Franklin Mint. The Perth Mint restruck some bullion coins and are still suffering from that decision. Hmmm they seem to be doing just fine, short term they may have been suffering some but not now its seems. I don't think this will hurt the RM "much" either. People get all exited about new releases etc and these indiscretions from mints seem to fade away like the melting snow in the spring time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1571 Posts |
I think any coins released to date have to be honoured at face value. If they decided to no longer honour $1000 bills, there would be an outrage from collectors that stored a few away when they stopped being made.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  Canada
2360 Posts |
Better be honoured at face value, because if they revert to melt value then a $200 for $200 would be worth about $40, 2 ounces of silver.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6768 Posts |
Take a brief look at the other forum pages - people started to deposit these coins in thousands of $$$, there is no demand on the secondary market, so no one want to stuck with the coins and rushing to bring them to the bank.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1571 Posts |
The lack of buyers on the secondary market may be due to the high mintage and being sold for face value from the mint. Why would someone pay higher than face value from a flipper if they can get it for face value directly from RCM? The people rushing to the bank are likely people that were trying to make money off them, not people that bought them for their own personal collection.
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
1360 Posts |
Quote:Why would someone pay higher than face value from a flipper if they can get it for face value directly from RCM? Or Canada Post for that matter, who have consistently sold the $20/4/$20 coins for $25, while the mint was $20 with free shipping.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
canada post sells them for 25$ because they pay 20$ each for them, there are no dicounts on any of these type coins..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6768 Posts |
Quote:Why would someone pay higher than face value from a flipper if they can get it for face value directly from RCM? Here, unlike my previous response, I would say, that couple of years ago (till the 10-th coin), I used to order from RCM and in addition to get some of them from dealer or CP for CAD 25. The reason - bought them for the gift, and unlike the RCM, dealers and CP had them in the sealed external clear sleeve, that was very giftable (and I gave them as small gifts - we had many foreign business travelers)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  Canada
2360 Posts |
Quote: canada post sells them for 25$ because they pay 20$ each for them, there are no dicounts on any of these type coins.. Not so fast silverwolf, I got a 25% discount on the $25.00 cost of a 20 for 20 coin and I paid $18.75 for the $20.00 face value coin. Best deal I ever made in buying currency. I went back the next day to try again but they ran out of $20 for $20 coins. Here is the receipt. Not sure you could ever do this again, but it was a great deal. 
|
|
|
Replies: 83 / Views: 8,479 |
|