| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 7,120 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Mintmark position is wrong. The first thing I look for is a line of bumps under the buffalo's belly, and I'm not seeing it.
I am going to say that this is a genuine coin, but altered.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
I am no expert in Buffalo series, I do agree something appear altered, but take the chance and submit to ANACS. Hopefully it will come back as genuine.
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Thanks everyone for the input. It looks like it's 50/50 on whether or not it's real, so I'll just send it off and see what the pros say.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I'll cast my vote for not genuine. the geniune was caused by overpolishing a very late stage die and it was paired with a late stage obv as well. This coin does not show the late stage features and as mentioned the mintmark position is different. There is only one die recognized as the 37 D three legged and this isn't it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
Also look at the date, it looks somewhat doubled, the 1 has something happen to it on it's upper half, and the 9 is filled in: 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
Save your money.
Genuine coin but it has been altered to make it look like a three legger. The hind leg is the giveaway as it is way too strong. It should be weak and have a moth eaten appearance.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
I'm no expert...but to me the mint mark on the OPs coin looks like it is set farther left and tilted. Coops coins in straight and appears to start just off the E in One not under the E
Unless there was more that one die making these three leggers than I would say it is fake or altered.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Only one die for the three leggers.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
There are some reasonably educational images of genuine and false 3 legged buffalos to be found on Google Images.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1291 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
814 Posts |
Could there have been other dies that aren't "the" die, produce varieties of this variety? Surely more than one became over polished in the M-LDS.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Could there? Possibly, but no other has ever turned up.
The problem with identifying a second one would be getting people to keep an open mind about the possibility. The knee jerk reaction is people take one look, compare it to the known one, see it doesn't match and just dismiss it out of hand. You see that a lot on the online forums. Someone comes in with a 1955, 72 or 69 S cents and ask "Is that a Doubeld die?" People take one look, see it isn't the major one for that year and say No, it should look like this." and post a picture of the "Big One" completely ignoring the fact that it MIGHT be one of the others known for that year.
Still the problem with this being a possible second die is that if a second die had received an extensive enough polishing to remove the front leg, I would expect it to have similar rear leg and distant E PLURIBUS UNUM to what the first die had.
Edited by Conder101 06/01/2016 7:39 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1080 Posts |
I say, "No good." The hind legs should appear moth-eaten. The Indian's neck and forehead should have more chatter. I wouldn't buy it. Just my five cents.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 7,120 |
Page 2 of 2
|