Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Please Grade This Eisenhower Dollar

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,706Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/18/2008  11:55 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
You guys were a little off and it's probably because of my photos. This may not crossover to a 65 to a top TPG but it would have a good chance. These Ikes are hard to find without a lot of bagmarks in their prime focal areas. This one is pretty clean.
You'd have to see it in hand. Remember these were not in the mint sets and there was no special care taken with them from the mint.

Please-Grade-This-Eisenhower-Dollar
Pillar of the Community
United States
2797 Posts
 Posted 03/18/2008  2:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SeatedNut to your friends list
I would also have to agree with the AU grade, despite the Numistrust Slab. There are too many marks and slight wear evident in the photos. PCGS would evaluate this piece based upon a well struck example directly from the mint and award a 65 based upon the quality of the strike and appearance. No special dispensation would be given for the post mint handling marks evident on this piece.

If this crosses to an MS PCGS slab, I would gladly consume mass quantities of crow.
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2008  11:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
Thanks to all who responded, first of all I'd like to say I know the reputation of NTC. In this case I bought the coin not the slab. Now I really think the true grade of this coin is MS-64. Many people that don't collect Ikes do not know that several revisions were made to the design of the Copper-Nickel clad coins during 1971 and 1972, they were poorly made. It wasn't until 1973 that acceptable strikes were achieved. As most know poor strikes on an uncirculated coin sometimes gives the coin the appearance of being AU. The strike on the coin I pictured is not as bad as it looks. I have one other 1971 Ike in a slab and it's from a TPG, so for arguments sake if the first coin grades AU-50 what would you grade this one. Pic is with the same camera, lighting and white balance.

Please-Grade-This-Eisenhower-Dollar

Please-Grade-This-Eisenhower-Dollar




Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
5953 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2008  11:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nohope587 to your friends list
What you say is tru about the ikes from 71 and 72 but yours just lacks the definition to get into the MS range I think. there is also some wear on the top right of the eagles feathers,
Compare.. Obverses.

Please-Grade-This-Eisenhower-Dollar
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2008  12:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
Hi nohope587, which coin has the wear on the eagles feathers, the first coin pic I posted or the one I just posted today? These are 2 different coins. The strike on your coin is awesome, but it's not a fair comparison, like comparing apples to oranges. I have many 40% silver Ikes and proofs in TPG slabs and I'll post some pics later in the week. If a coin was weakly struck and never saw circulation it would still grade MS or uncirculated. Thanks for your opinion and the great pic of the '72-S!
Edited by mr merc
03/19/2008 12:13 pm
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2008  1:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
I found a pic of a 1971 Ike in a PCGS slab from a Heritage auction.

Image: Please-Grade-This-Eisenhower-Dollar pcgs65.jpg
46.31 KB
Pillar of the Community
United States
6388 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2008  1:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list
Hi Mr. Merc,
I would agree that the PCGS coin really doesn't look too good for an MS65 coin. It appears that the typical indifferent strike and poor luster on an early Ike dollar makes it hard to grade. Nevertheless, the NTC coin and the second example you posted both have an AU-ish look, IMO. Luster is very weak on both coins and there seems to be some slight discoloration on the cheek and head which looks like light wear.

The great rarity of truly nice business-strike Ike dollars is evident from auction prices. Silver Ikes from San Francisco in PCGS MS67 can be had for less than $50. The cheapest PCGS MS67 Denver coin I found on the Heritage auction archive sold for almost $3000. I only saw one PCGS MS67 Philly coin. It was a 1976 Bicentennial and went for over $4000 .
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/19/2008  8:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
Yes Jaobler, any buisness strike MS-66 and above are pretty rare for these coins. I've got a few more buisness strike Ikes graded MS in TPG slabs and they all have that same subdued luster. Here's a hint, the second coin I posted is in an ANACS slab and it's uncirculated.
Edited by mr merc
03/20/2008 09:43 am
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/20/2008  09:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
I'll post a pic of the second coin in the slab when someone takes a guess at the grade.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
5953 Posts
 Posted 03/20/2008  10:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nohope587 to your friends list
the ANACS one would probably have been graded MS63 in one of their older holders if its one of the new holders but before they got tough I would say MS64. I don't say I agree with the grades but its what I think ANACS would have given. I think the TPGs are overly generous on the earlier Ikes. Just my 2 Cents worth.
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/20/2008  11:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
Hi nohope587, you hit the nail right on the head. It's in an old ANACS holder, I've had this coin at least 8 years. Yes they graded tougher back then in a lot of folks opinions. I'm sure the other coin is also MS, no breaks in the cartwheel and in hand is much nicer than the ANACS graded coin and a better strike, compare the outline of the moons surface. So does anyone think the other coin has a decent chance at MS 65 from a TPG? Wow, I'm really beating this one to death!

Please-Grade-This-Eisenhower-Dollar
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts
 Posted 03/22/2008  4:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gbchaosmaster to your friends list
I wouldn't give the first coin anymore than MS62, and it has (IMO) absolutemy no chance of making even MS64 from a good TPG. SGS might give it an MS70 though! ANACS got the second one spot on.
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/22/2008  11:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
Well considering the first coin has better luster, less major marks and a better strike,why do you say ANACS got the second coin "spot on" and why do you say the first coin is MS-62 at best? If you could just post you reasoning for the grades I would appreciate it as we are all trying to learn here. Thanks!
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts
 Posted 03/24/2008  03:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gbchaosmaster to your friends list
The first IKE had a lot of hairlines and dings in it, keeping it from MS65 and BU. I say 62 because of the luster I see and the eye appeal (which, I agree is probably much different in hand). The second one has a bit of a better luster and a couple less hairlines.

Some people may disagree, this is simply my opinion.
Edited by gbchaosmaster
03/24/2008 03:34 am
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 03/29/2008  12:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list
Thanks for your opinion gbchaomaster, there was no special attention for these coins when they were minted as you know. So yes there are hairlines and dings in almost all of them before any were circulated. This does not keep a coin from being uncirculated or BU.
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 3,706Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums