| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,855 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
XF50, Details...been dipped/cleaned...carbon(?) spots on reverse look like residuals of unremovable staining. That said, you can always send it to me if you find it unacceptable, free of course, will reimburse for postage...  (Sorry, turkey affects me this way, why I eat it only once a year!) |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Uncirculated, details, cleaned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
You're right - no doubt. Bad hip shot.  Edited by Coinfrog
11/24/2017 6:04 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Looks Mint State but does look problematic.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I'm with Mox on this one .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
WOW! What an obverse strike!!
Unfortunate on the dip.
|
|
New Member
49 Posts |
Dipped, ouch  Edited by Reeds253
11/25/2017 03:00 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
Agree, dipped and all the luster is gone. MS or AU details.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19975 Posts |
Appears flat and completely devoid of luster. What a shame, that's a very tough coin to find in high grades.
MS details
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
I'm new to this and trying to hone my grading skills, so pardon the newbie question. What details are you seeing that tip you off that the coin has been cleaned?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Jaunty , this one may be a little hard to tell from the eyes of a Newbie . But the reverse is lacking that original Wheat cent color be it brown ,red or red & brown , this coin exhibits a slight dull pinkish color on it's reverse . indicating a cleaning .  |
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
Thanks T-Bop! I was thinking it might have been the very light apparent scratches on the obverse field. Good to know that I was on the wrong track.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,855 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/24/2017 3:53 pm
