| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,625 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
1916-D. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
I am seeing 1916 also...I think?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
mcshilling - There is no 1910-D!  Otherwise, I give. |
|
Valued Member
United States
234 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
Looks like a 1916-D. Taking a photo so the area after the "191" appears darker may help.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21610 Posts |
I agree with 1916D  |
|
Moderator
United States
188524 Posts |
I know we all want it to be a 1914-D, but it is most likely a 1916-D.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Everyone will agree the first 3 numbers are 191. However, it's that last digit that could be a 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 and on and on and on. However, for sure it's not a 1.  |
|
Valued Member
Russian Federation
417 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
54282 Posts |
It CAN NOT be a 1914-D with the mint mark in that spot.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
Looks like a 14-S to me because the mm seems to be higher rather than wider. Especially, looks like an S in the 3rd pic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
My first thought is an altered date tossed in a tumbler to disguise their work. The shiny red copper and the way LIBERTY and the date are so mushed out does not seem natural to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
986 Posts |
I'm not sure about the date but it would fit right into a lowball collection.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,625 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/06/2018 09:47 am
