| Author |
 Replies: 36 / Views: 39,081 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 142 Posts |
Thank you for your reply! Mr Coop.
|
|
Valued Member
142 Posts |
I think my posted pics "The One Coin" of 1962D LMC was a machanical error striking process cent, because a date number of "8" can be changed to "3" by human hand cutting the west side edge of "8", but it is certainly impossible to raise or to fall, to tilted or to erected the pattern of a date number by human hand.  The One Coin  The Normal Cent  The One Coin  The Normal Cent  Edited by chgk1328
05/17/2018 09:39 am
|
|
New Member
United States
3 Posts |
There is a difference in the nine and the two. See 1982 small date for reference.
|
|
New Member
United States
3 Posts |
What you have posted are repunched mint marks. The two has more of a question mark to its look on a small date and the nine's inner loop points toward the rim or angled at a ninety degree angle. Every year in the sixties has both large and small dates. Even the 1982 has smalland large dates and most 1970's as well.
|
|
New Member
United States
3 Posts |
Your first coin may even be a small over large date.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75271 Posts |
 To CCF mike59silva! Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
142 Posts |
mike59silva,thanks for your distinctive analysis.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
There are no large and small date varieties for the 1962-D cent.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Another over polished die example: Proof 1962 Cent:   Even the slightest hit on the ends of the '2' on the date could alter the angle. Just one size date that year. (normal) |
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
to the Community, mike59silva! |
|
Valued Member
142 Posts |
I have found that "The Only Cent" had a vertically standing and taller "2" than "the left tilted 2" of normal cent and Mr Coop's "Proof 1962 Cent".
Edited by chgk1328
07/18/2018 09:34 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Well there is only one normal size for that year. All devices smaller than normal were altered by die polishings or damaged during circulation.  |
|
Valued Member
142 Posts |
All of the 1962 normal cents were left tilted, except "The Only Cent" was vertically upright standing,and l think it was impossible to alter a tilted "2" to a vertically upright "2" by circulation damage or die polishing,if so then we could find lot of such circulation "Upright 2" cent. The Upright"2"(The Only Cent)  The Tilted"2"(The Normal Cent)  Edited by chgk1328
07/18/2018 11:56 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75271 Posts |
Here we go again....
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
United States
14463 Posts |
According to my sources, there is no 1962-D small date/large date variance. Multiple users have expressed this same fact. Sorry that your mind is not accepting opinions from multiple experts. This discussion is going no where.  |
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 36 / Views: 39,081 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 05/17/2018 09:37 am
