| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,997 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say 64 judging from the obverse fields - can't ask for much more.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I'll go MS64+ assuming the obverse scuffs are just missing surface frost. As Coinfrog noted the fields are pristine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
6612 Posts |
One more pic. Shes pretty beat up. The lighting monster is getting me nice die brake 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 Scratch my original call, pun intended. 61/62 tops. Almost looks deliberate.
Edited by Coinfrog 12/24/2018 3:12 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
6612 Posts |
@ Coinfrog its in a GSA holder
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
314 Posts |
Cant be higher than 62 due to the face, but the fields are pretty nice
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36845 Posts |
Yep, first photos very deceiving. MS-62. Good example of how photos can make it look like two different coins.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
I'd go 62 if it were not for the scuff marks. That takes it down pretty bad for me. I have some like that I can't get anyone to buy, I just threw them in the melt bag. Lighting makes a huge difference, that's how I got *took* on a couple epay coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5680 Posts |
I'd say MS-62. Looks like a spiked date, VAM-4A if you're interested.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18703 Posts |
just goes to show you how photos can really affect perception. MS62
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11899 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,997 |
Page 2 of 2
|