| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,501 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Too much wear for AU, but could make XF
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I think EF40. If it comes back higher, I think the TPGrader may have given in to the temptation to do so.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
New Member
Canada
39 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Beautiful reverse, a couple of the jewels worn gives it a EF-40-45
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9165 Posts |
I'm with every one else VF40
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
822 Posts |
This coin is graded at AU-53. Where are all the veins on the leaves ? I always thought that an AU coin should have some lustre. The field on the obverse of this coin is 100% marked-up, not even close to an AU. Missing the pearls to the left of the centre jewel, which is also worn, used to be the line between VF-EF. Grade creep, caused by US grading companies, is real.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
194 Posts |
yeah, you are totally right! But fortunately, canadian buyers tend to look for ICCS graded coin. PCGS and NGC are more reliable in MS62+ grade, below that, better stay away. People need to remember, BUY THE COIN not the holder! :)
Thanks for the exemple!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
I'm at VF 30 here. 35 if there were such a thing.
This is def not an AU coin. Not today, not ever.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
No way this is an AU coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1530 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,501 |
Page 2 of 2
|