| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 3,183 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
My guess is MS63 based on the first images.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11904 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18708 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6619 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
789 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Nice luster, I'll push it to 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7078 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
308 Posts |
PCGS said 65. Strike leaves a little to be desired but the "scratches" on the obverse are on the holder. Fields and cheek are relatively clean.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Alrighty then!  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Is the doubling I see on the obverse profile actually on the coin or just a photo anomaly? Also, your I-phone is capable of better images than you posted here. I suggest you and anyone else using an I-phone read through this thread http://goccf.com/t/160092 it will help you unlock the capabilities of the camera.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
This looks like one I had many years ago, it also had the doubled nose in the profile. When I sold it, it did not command any premium for that feature at the time. Mine was PCGS MS-65 so I didn't notice that until now.
Edited by jimbucks
06/26/2019 3:30 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
308 Posts |
100% yes Dave, it is a doubled profile. While it is not a "recognized" VAM, it is the EDS of 1Y. I'll take a look through the photo link...thanks! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1215 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 3,183 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/23/2019 09:51 am
