| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,552 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Pics do not show surfaces well enough to evaluate accurately. Photographing proofs is not easy.  to the CCF!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8939 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Thank you. I had a tough time wit the pics... I see now how difficult it is to capture them.. Do these help? Thanks again.. Nice to have someone to bounce things off of. Doug   
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
PF-67. Eye Appeal 9/10. Beautiful example although I wouldn't TPG this one if you were considering doing so. A proud coin.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
128 Posts |
I always hesitate to say 'proof' on a coin not in some sort of official 'this is a proof' thing because most people with proof coins tend to keep them as they were acquired, not take them out of their package and put them on the carpet to take pics :P But that coin is in extremely good shape, its absolutely proof-like if not official, and you should IMHO give it a light bath (read if you need to on how to do that without doing any damage) and seal it up in something that will keep it safe.
Official grading is rather pricey, so I would say no to that.
Edited by jonnin 10/05/2019 8:23 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
I thought "proof" coins has the powdery look to the raised surfaces.... Thank you for the info on the bath. I will read up on it before making that happen.
What do you think a coin like this is worth? It's nice no doubt. But, I've seen some things on Youtube etc... where some of the values for the 61's are crazy. how far back in the safe should I put this one? hahahaha
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Nice Proof . Make sure you hold it by the edges only and holder that bad boy . Do not try to clean it . 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
128 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189700 Posts |
 to the Community! Your post was moved to the appropriate forum for the proper attention. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7293 Posts |
I have a 1959 which is comparable value to your 1961, I paid $13 for mine. I doubt yours is worth much more than that. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
I can't see much wrong with this one, PF-68 but not enough frost for a cameo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6615 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
575 Posts |
The problem with Franklins and value is that by the late 50's and early 60's the US Mint was beginning to get that they could make a lot more profit with proofs and mint sets. The numbers produced soared over the decade.
For instance, in 1951 they made almost 17,000,000 business strikes in Philadelphia alone, but less than 60,000 proofs.
By 1961, business strikes had dropped 50% to about 8,000,000, but proof production increased 5000% to 3,000,000.
People weren't using them for daily transactions, but they were holding onto them for value. In short, we ended up with a market flooded with very high quality coins that no one was supposed to spend and as a result are very common, even today, almost 60 years later.
It's always seemed like such a shame that the late Franklins are worth so little, but they were made in such (relatively) large numbers and were so aggressively marketed as investments that they have survived in such huge numbers.
The short answer to your question is no - don't pay to have it graded. You can buy a 1961 Proof Franklin already graded PR67 by PCGS for $40, and probably less if you shop around. It will cost you at least $30 to have yours graded.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,552 |
Page 2 of 2
|