| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,160 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
21 Posts |
i'll load more pics of the die markers and close up microscope pics shortly. I do thank everyone for the feedback and for looking. even if these are not the real deal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
 To my knowledge, the only MM style for 69 was the MMS-008. I've never heard of a micro S. That said, I'm not a LMC expert. |
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
you are correct it would be a discovery possibly. unless it is infact just a philly. although it has the die marker through liberty and under the scope you can see a faded normal size S MM and 2 micro S MM one is on the rim beside the last 9. it has very similiar doubling to the known version and the die marker. I am no
|
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
thats prolly true but the die marker is there in liberty. micro s on the rim close to the last 9.
also with magnification you can see a normal S MM but it is faded or polished to much so its not visable.
I think this is why they hit it with a micro MM. these things would be rare and very hard to identify if
what I believe is true. I'm no expert but I do thank you for looking and commenting.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 . Please use a different method of taking coin photos. The better the photos you post, the better we can help you. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
Any die marker you feel you see is meaningless when it is obviously not from the same die. Even if you are correct about the "micro S", then it would be from a different die. Forget any minor die markers in the case of this coin, just look for the doubling, no way to miss it on this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5239 Posts |
to the CCF! Not seeing anything from you're pics. What devises are you seeing two of? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@peasantking die markers only matter if there's doubling. Doubling on this variety should be naked eye visible. None of these are the DDO. No idea what you mean by a "micro S" on the Pilly, but that is not a thing. You also seem to have posted a Denver, which is also obviously not a 1969-S anything, let alone the DDO. Edited by SamCoin
09/05/2021 08:26 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5780 Posts |
As others have said. Doubling is first and then the markers, not the other way around.
Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups.
We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1657 Posts |
Look at the pictures posted by Ty2020b, if it doesn't look exactly like that, it isn't it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
189053 Posts |
to the Community! |
|
New Member
United States
21 Posts |
Big thanks to everyone who looked and commented. I'll do my best to upgrade my photography skills and I'm grateful for all comments and advice. even if its not what I want to hear lol.
Sincerely
The PeasantKing
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Best way to not let your dreams get dashed on the rocks, is to ask to see what it is first. Then the let down will be a lot easier. Everyone wants to find the 'Holy Grail' coins, when they think they have (but really they haven't) they call out on that. IE: 1969-S DDO. Less than 50 out there probably. They find a normal coin and think they have found it. And they feel they we are the bad guys, for just telling them it is a normal coin. The people to what out for are the ones that tell them it is a normal coin, but still offer them a small offer. If it is not a valuable coin, why are they interested in it? Watch for the bait on the trap. Edited by coop
09/07/2021 10:37 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
to the CCF! |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,160 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/05/2021 01:41 am
