| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,657 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Definitely not less than AU-58 sharpness, possibly Unc. Unsure if dipping is an issue. Rim nick detracts.  to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5686 Posts |
to CCF! Looks mint state to me, possibly MS-62. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21658 Posts |
It is not a high value coin as there were close to 10 million
produced but for $30.00, you did OK.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Hard to judge . Ill guess AU-53
Looks closer to AU-55 but has numerous marks with larger ones above and below her eye
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I'll go with 53 or 55.
Nice die crack on the reverse at k8-k10.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190128 Posts |
to the Community! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
 with Coinfrog. No less than AU-58 but hard to say, possibly low MS. The large contact mark beneath the date is very distracting. Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
MS-61, just a bit of mishandling.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
and you got a bargain at $30. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Mint state. I'd say MS-62. Some distracting marks particularly the rim hit near the date hold it back.
|
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
Ok I'm not sure if it was dipped or not before I got it but and the coin is very shiny it's hard to get a good picture due to glare so I did my best w my phone until I get a new microscope camera. I may take it to our local coin shop and see what the owner I'm not really able to get it graded currently but if it's got potential for a higher grade I'll put it in a plastic holder vs 2x2 staple flip. Thank you all for your guestimates
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18720 Posts |
another looks at this coin I'm revising my assessment.
I think the dullness I was seeing on the obv is due to the photo/lighting. the hit above the eye is a little distracting but not sufficient to details the coin. the rim nick does not look like it crossed into the denticles so I dont that will also. it would be nice to have another photo of the obv or different angle and little less blurry to see the high points. AU58 or MS62.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,657 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/06/2022 09:11 am
