| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,095 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5686 Posts |
I'd say AU-58. Hard to see the surfaces on the obverse, but it might make MS.
|
|
Valued Member
 Germany
312 Posts |
Thanks for the reply. Tomorrow (its quite late here now.), I will try to get a better picture of the surfaces.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1521 Posts |
Obverse photo makes it look like there is a luster break in the field, so AU-58. Better lighting on the photos would help here
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34447 Posts |
@hp, first welcome to CCF.
Second, it isn't a huge deal, but please use full, four digit dates in your thread titles moving forward. It helps with the search functionality. I'll fix these latest few for you no problem. Thx.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
looks AU-58 from the pics
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Spence, I will make sure to do that. I have better pic of the obverse. Now there a fine scratches evident, I really have not seen them with the naked eye at all before. But actually in bright daylight they are visible if one looks a a very flat angle. From up front they are completely invisible. These photos are cruel... ;D  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Vertical hairlines on obverse, reverse looks original and MS. UNC Details Cleaned
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. Edited by jacrispies
07/16/2022 01:36 am
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Thanks, John.
Wow, not sure if I will dive deeply into this stuff.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18720 Posts |
always remove coins from the holder when possible as they can alter the look of the surfaces. try not to use overhead lighting. natural light maybe on a window sill or diffused light is best
the strike is a little better than a typcial 78(S) so thats a plus.
the does appear to be circulation on second obv photo hair but I'm not seeing it anywhere else so it could be cabinet rub. I dont think its from any striking issue as the rest of the devices are pretty good.
luster is broken on both sides. reverse pic not that great probably because we dont have a shot outside the holder
a lot of chatter on the cheek and obv fields. the first set of photos are showing a cleaned coin. this is why its important to take pics outside of holders with diffused light.
without better photos AU58 but the halos on the second obv shot around the stars are pointing towards a cleaning. so AU58 details (cleaned) is my assessment without better photos
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1521 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
I experimented a bit with choosing a more neutral background (for a better auto-focus) and a diffusor over the light source. Let me know if these photos are any better now EDIT: Parts of the coin are still slightly out of focus. Its a little frustrating.   Edited by HP2001PH
07/18/2022 12:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2287 Posts |
Au58
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Btw. all in all I like this coin, it has the beginning of a warm toning goin on and is struck rather sharply I feel. I bought it off ebay with a winning bid of 54€. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,095 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/15/2022 7:19 pm
