| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 1,828 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
98440 Posts |
Try soaking it in acetone over night and using a soft thorn to remove the gunk in the MM, then have a second look at it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Good idea, that might help. Wood toothpick works well.
Edited by Coinfrog 09/09/2022 7:24 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 Hong Kong
155 Posts |
Thanks for your helpful suggestions & opinions!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Be careful with a toothpick. On the gunk that comes off, sometimes sand is mixed into the gunk. Pushing this with a toothpick can make sand scratches on the fields of the coin. (I've seen this myself on a coin)
|
|
Valued Member
 Hong Kong
155 Posts |
Thanks for your reminding! Mr Cooper.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
I had very nice results with compressed air blow when it is soft.
|
|
Valued Member
 Hong Kong
155 Posts |
I think that's the another very good suggestion. Thank you very much!
|
|
Valued Member
 Hong Kong
155 Posts |
Edited by chgk1628 09/13/2022 11:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@CHGK: you have. After clean is clear. What attribution? No idea, they are mixt-up with this.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The area on the lower SW part of the mintmark is a damaged punch issue. The damaged punch issue is from the dies being already hardened, then when the die is punched to add the mintmark, it can alter the punch, damaging the punch: http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20L...%201942S.htmNote on the listed RPM's on V.V that other dies are showing the same damaged punch mark, but it is not part of the RPM. Your coin is from a normal mintmark die with the damaged punch issue. (not a RPM)
|
|
Valued Member
 Hong Kong
155 Posts |
Thanks for your details description! Mr Cooper.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
98440 Posts |
Ah! Much better looking coin - Love that acetone. A damaged MM punch? huh, would not have thought of that.. Very nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
With all respect COOP I have to contradict you and show some 70 years old punches which I still use on very hard metals and work like new. FIRST: The Wexler phot show an engraver working to engrave and not to punch an MM. Punch an MM will be never perform on the engraving ball which move very easy and will not be stable for the punching. SECOND: The Dies are hardened only before go to striking presses. Never before. THIRD: The punches are from 80% fine steel and 20% Silver. and will never broke or chip like the working Dies. Who come with this Myth it is just pure high imagination and not facts Sorry but we have to recognize what it is and how the things work and goes. I do not exclude a Die chip in this case, like I do not exclude also an RPM. VV do not show to much in detail of the MM. They find many for this year and is hard to find without a compare tables. 
|
|
Valued Member
 Hong Kong
155 Posts |
Very appreciate for your details analysis, information and opinions!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Very soon I will extract and put here an document in which is state from the Mint the way the MM is punch and when. The folk say was punch on the Die which it is not true. The MM was always punch on the Master Die. In my previous post here I omitted to mention Master Die so please read Die =Master Die.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 1,828 |
Page 2 of 2
|