| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 6,107 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19964 Posts |
I like the "floating head" much better! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
Some years ago I sold a few of these at 99 cent auction on ebay. That's usually a pretty good gauge for price since the buyers figure it out among themselves. All the coins were RAW but would have graded MS65 or so (top examples from BU rolls) and I think the average sale price was right around $5 plus $3 shipping.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
If we had a complete photo of your coin (which we always ask for) we'd be able to give you more of an exact figure, but seeing your coin in as is, I'd estimate a value of 50 to 75 cents. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
TB,did you keep any higher grades for your collection? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6116 Posts |
Yeah, I kept at least one in my collection, plus somewhere I probably still have the group of them that I found but didn't sell. The one in my collection would be the top grade example.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Just extreme die polishing. Die event.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
From point of view of collector is not pricy. It is just an event so no variety or error. How speculators go is crazy, but they go with big words and ask huge amount and new in collecting buy and later realize that they buy nothing.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I have little to no interest in them, but some people do collect them. I would never buy one but if I was to find a higher grade one roll searching, I would keep it. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
Die event or Mint event? More food for thought. When the floating roof was thought to be a common issue that occurred on any given year. My research done back then found 99% of memorial cents exhibiting full double sided (abraded) floating roof were from the years 1969 and 1970. The remaining 1% is not set to memory as I can't recall any other year that shows both sides fully abraided in the same fashion, much less multiple dies from the same years. Of that 99%, the majority working die examples were in production at the Denver and San Francisco mints. Some produced from the Philadelphia mint was found as well, but less common. Side note: PCGS listed 1969D FS-901 no FG do to the missing intials, but soon found more than one die was effected and stopped slabbing them as a unique die variety soon there after. Another time line: In 1969 a new reverse (RDV-002) as well as obverse (ODV-024) designs were introduced. Also note this year the alignment lugs used for the multi squeeze hubbing and die alignments were discontinued due to hubbing issues. Some thought to be a contributing factor to the major 1969S Class I DDO. Several other DDO's were produced between that year and 1972 including another major Class I DDO from Philadelphia and the alignment lugs were reintrodused in 1973. The full double sided floating roof seem to stop after 1970. Note: the arival of the RDV-008(?) design was put in production along with the RDV-002 design in 1971 and would seem to follow into 1972. Again I've seen some other years come close, but not completely abraded after 1970. In 1973 the RDV-003 design was introduced and the 1969-72 RDV-002 design was no more. To summerise I can only speculate and assume the dies were annealed and hardened proper, as I was not present to see the 1969 - 1970 initial hub or die impressions. But I do still wonder if the reverse hubbing and or die impressions might have been lacking in some respect during this time period to start with? If so that could explain the acceleration of the process of what it actually is, a seemingly hastened die abrasion issue. I'm under the impression all working hubs and working dies were manufactured at the Philadelphia mint and distributed to the other mints production plants during this time period. Thanks, Doug. Followup: If memory is working today. I'd have to check PCGS again, but thought I saw a slabbed MS graded 1969D no FG sold at auction for over $500.00 back in a 2017.
Edited by Halo1st 12/27/2022 4:22 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@Halo: was 2016 and the coin was not only this (if you referee to Heritage). But to day on ebay we see fake those tones with 1000 and more. I give you an example of this: https://www.ebay.ca/itm/40096646808...221226082317I contact and explain that the stage D is VLDS so is not so pricy. That coin was posted here before. Anyone can take the conclusion .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
Halo, man they have to be some kind of stupid to spend $500.00 on a 1 cent coin. Gullible people. And that it was 2017 makes it even worse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
Let me say I'm sorry if were going a bit off topic here. I didn't bid on it. I think its more to with someone wanting an original MS graded 1969D no FG slabbed from PCGS back in the day, rather than acquiring a fake off of ebay. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Halo: You has a nice one for you? Good. PM your address and I will send you a slab for which can also be vacuum.
Hal: I talk with others and seem the 69 will become RDV-003. Now we study some others before and seem to be real this.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
72 Posts |
All very good info. thank you again!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 6,107 |
Page 2 of 2
|