| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,141 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
I couldn't have come up with that one. Shows what little I know about errors.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1807 Posts |
Fake die. They did a pretty crappy job of whatever they were trying to do. Can't see how this could happen after the minting process.  Or this;  Edited by rockdude
03/10/2009 2:05 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Fascinating...look at LIBERTY. Did someone try to mimic the 1955 DDO--and this was a trial run?  Of course, this is a 55-D. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
The soft, blended overlap, multiple sets of extra design elements, subtle flattening of the original design, and uneven bulging of the coin's outline are all characteristic of crude counterfeit strikes. These can get far more sophisticated and convincing.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Edited by mikediamond
03/11/2009 09:28 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5629 Posts |
Dude, I still feel it is a very unique find, a keeper, good eye...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
That's a fake you could tell by the S it;s so large in comparrison to the nornal s in the coin it's obvious JAZEC  Edited by Jazzcoins
03/12/2009 09:34 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
Whether it's been altered post mint or not the 'S' is the same size. Do the measuring.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
I did it's not the same size
JAZEC
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
Well since I've got the coin in hand and you don't I will have to say you are wrong.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
But I have good eyes you know that  Jazec  Edited by Jazzcoins
03/12/2009 12:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
Edited by Jazzcoins
03/12/2009 2:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
145 Posts |
Quote:
Can't see how this could happen after the minting process. With fake dies the same way these were done. These were both determined to be fakes but whoever did them was a little better at it then whoever did yours.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
It is , as Mike indicated, a fake. There were a large number of these made that were dated 1964, for example. They have been made for many years. A true double strike looks completely different.
Thanks,
Bill
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,141 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/10/2009 1:57 pm
