| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 417 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74906 Posts |
Just goes to show that even TPG's can miss detecting counterfeits. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8800 Posts |
At this point I see no difference other than the right one looks beat all to heck and should not be the same grade. As far as the 1 in relationship to the denticles, it's kind of like mm placement, it can be different on this date.
-makecents-
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
898 Posts |
Yeah, I don't see that either is fake. You'd have to be some sort of wizard to make that toning on either coin. Even without toning, they both look like real nicely struck Morgans. So what are we supposed to be seeing? Why submit them at all, MS62 not even worth $100.
Edited by adam126402
06/29/2026 9:31 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97909 Posts |
I don't see a difference either.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3235 Posts |
To clear the air. Both are legit. Neither is a fake. The PCGS Numbers are sequential. The odd thing here is that they were purchased a couple of weeks apart during two different Great Collections auctions. Obviously an individual seller put them up for auction and the process was PCGS graded both coins one after the other, hence the sequential numbers. They were just put up at two different times. I just happened to win both of them never knowing until tonight that they were sequential. Just one of those little oddities...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5682 Posts |
They were clearly graded together, either by the owner or GC, but perhaps GC decided to list them in separate auctions because they are nearly identical coins. Interesting that the twins found a home together again!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2220 Posts |
Very nice, srs77  Side Note: Don't believe every comment you see on here, Hondo caught it right away ! |
|
Moderator
United States
189707 Posts |
Very interesting! I have a pair of PCGS Ikes that are sequential (1976-D V1 and V2), but they were bought at the same time from our very own Darth Morgan.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
660 Posts |
Excuse me for jumping in, but if both are legit, why are the two "S's" in pluribus different. One looks upside down.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5682 Posts |
Quote:
why are the two "S's" in pluribus different They look identical to me. I think the toning and lighting may be causing an illusion. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3235 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
189707 Posts |
Quote:
Nice JBuck! Thank you. |
|
Moderator
United States
189707 Posts |
Quote:
They look identical to me. I think the toning and lighting may be causing an illusion. I agree. Just an illusion. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3235 Posts |
Quote:
They were clearly graded together, either by the owner or GC, but perhaps GC decided to list them in separate auctions because they are nearly identical coins. Interesting that the twins found a home together again! I believe this to be the correct answer. I just found it interesting that in consecutive weekly auctions I'd end up winning two Morgan's that were sequential. |
|
Moderator
United States
189707 Posts |
Quote:
I just found it interesting that in consecutive weekly auctions I'd end up winning two Morgan's that were sequential.  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 417 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/29/2026 9:10 pm
